SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

GMJR said this

Créé par: LetsTalkNHL
Équipe: 2018-19 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 5 févr. 2019
Publié: 5 févr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
GMJR was on the radio yesterday and said that the Pens shouldn't need a winger once everyone is healthy. He also stated that he'd love to keep the 1st round pick and that he is still talking to teams just to stay in the loop. He also wants to get his injured players back before making any final decisions.

The Pens may still be on the lookout for a 3C. When the Florida trade was made, he said that he sees Bjugstad on the wing. That either means he sees McCann as his 3C or hell look to make a move for one. The Pens will need cap space for next year, so maybe he looks to deal for a 3C while shedding cap.

With all this, I believe the Pens either stand pat and make no more moves or deal for a 3C like Tierney, Pageau, Granlund, etc. Thoughts?
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2479 500 000 $75 686 559 $0 $982 500 $3 813 441 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
794 167 $794 167 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 févr. 2019 à 14 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 55
id want him to go get Dzingel for 3c
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 0
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: EGM
id want him to go get Dzingel for 3c


Dzingel hasn't been C much, but when he has, he's been pretty bad. 33 face-off wins and 51 face-off losses, for a 39.3%. He wouldn't be the ideal 3C and he's on an expiring deal.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: LetsTalkNHL
Dzingel hasn't been C much, but when he has, he's been pretty bad. 33 face-off wins and 51 face-off losses, for a 39.3%. He wouldn't be the ideal 3C and he's on an expiring deal.


aight true. i guess then we could keep Bjugstad at center tho and have Dzingel play wing?
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 5
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: EGM
aight true. i guess then we could keep Bjugstad at center tho and have Dzingel play wing?


If anything, I think a natural 3C would be the target. Just my opinion! smile
EGM a aimé ceci.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
I like Mccann and Bjugstad a lot, if Mccann was better at Faceoffs he would be perfect for 3C but he isnt great. I guess they can use Cullen and their 4th for big D zone draws and utilize Mccann mostly in the O-zone
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: shmoeman
I like Mccann and Bjugstad a lot, if Mccann was better at Faceoffs he would be perfect for 3C but he isnt great. I guess they can use Cullen and their 4th for big D zone draws and utilize Mccann mostly in the O-zone


Thats the only issue with McCann. Im really excited and curious to see the lineup once Malkin is back.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 24
#7
FrankFurter48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 262
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Nobody is talking about us improving our D. We need to trade Maatta and upgrade to a bonafide shutdown defensemen for the 2nd pair.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: FrankFurter48
Nobody is talking about us improving our D. We need to trade Maatta and upgrade to a bonafide shutdown defensemen for the 2nd pair.


That could be an option, but do you have any potential players they can target. A team that would actually make that move?
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 25
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 54
At some point they are going to have to start shedding salary and bad contracts. They have roughly $78.5m in committed salary and have to fill 3 NHL roster spots next season. The cap is supposedly going to be $83m next year. Rutherford has a long history of irresponsible spending and it will eventually catch up with the team and could be the reason to take the Penguins out of the contention window long before declining skill does so it might be a good idea to save the #1 pick this year unless you can get a good player on a friendly contract with term. Penguins #1 picks are always later in the round so it's really like a 2nd round pick so I don't see that happening unless you can pair that with another roster player. Combining Jarry and the #1 might be their only option in making that happen but they likely don't have the value to bring a substantial return.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 32
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: WhatsaMaattaWithYou
At some point they are going to have to start shedding salary and bad contracts. They have roughly $78.5m in committed salary and have to fill 3 NHL roster spots next season. The cap is supposedly going to be $83m next year. Rutherford has a long history of irresponsible spending and it will eventually catch up with the team and could be the reason to take the Penguins out of the contention window long before declining skill does so it might be a good idea to save the #1 pick this year unless you can get a good player on a friendly contract with term. Penguins #1 picks are always later in the round so it's really like a 2nd round pick so I don't see that happening unless you can pair that with another roster player. Combining Jarry and the #1 might be their only option in making that happen but they likely don't have the value to bring a substantial return.


In terms of moving players with cap, I can see it being Maatta, Pearson, JJ or even Hornqvist. I don't really think they wanna give up Pearson yet. A JJ move seems impossible and a Hornqvist seems unlikely, especially in the middle of the season. Like I said, I see a Maatta for 3C, but a Maatta for defensive LHD makes sense too. You'd have to think the player coming back has a cheaper AAV than Maatta.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 34
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 54
Quoting: FrankFurter48
Nobody is talking about us improving our D. We need to trade Maatta and upgrade to a bonafide shutdown defensemen for the 2nd pair.


They need a 2nd pairing defenseman who is good a moving the puck. It cripples the forwards when they're hemmed in their own zone. Penguins have the offense but need defensemen to get them the puck. Pettersson and Riikola are good puck movers but aren't all that strong on the defensive side of their game just yet. We all know Johnson won't be traded and It would make sense to trade Maatta. I wish the Pens would have got Muzzin but they don't have the assets. So what could the Pens honestly get if they packaged Maatta with Jarry and that 1st?
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 39
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: WhatsaMaattaWithYou
They need a 2nd pairing defenseman who is good a moving the puck. It cripples the forwards when they're hemmed in their own zone. Penguins have the offense but need defensemen to get them the puck. Pettersson and Riikola are good puck movers but aren't all that strong on the defensive side of their game just yet. We all know Johnson won't be traded and It would make sense to trade Maatta. I wish the Pens would have got Muzzin but they don't have the assets. So what could the Pens honestly get if they packaged Maatta with Jarry and that 1st?


Don't think they wanna move the 1st. Nonetheless, finding a really good defenseman who is making less than Maatta is highly unlikely. Deal would be really hard to make.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 40
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 54
Quoting: LetsTalkNHL
In terms of moving players with cap, I can see it being Maatta, Pearson, JJ or even Hornqvist. I don't really think they wanna give up Pearson yet. A JJ move seems impossible and a Hornqvist seems unlikely, especially in the middle of the season. Like I said, I see a Maatta for 3C, but a Maatta for defensive LHD makes sense too. You'd have to think the player coming back has a cheaper AAV than Maatta.


Pearson played fine with Malkin and once Shultz comes back, they should be fine. Mccann, Bleuger and Simon would be a perfect 4th line imo. JJ is only worth keeping around so they can leave him exposed in the next expansion draft lol.
LetsTalkNHL a aimé ceci.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 41
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 54
Quoting: LetsTalkNHL
Don't think they wanna move the 1st. Nonetheless, finding a really good defenseman who is making less than Maatta is highly unlikely. Deal would be really hard to make.


They might not have a choice. Maatta is no head turner and Jarrys stock isn't what it was.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 46
#15
Leafhater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 27
I think Tierney for Määttä would be a good start. Maybe JR can get Lahore too.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 46
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: WhatsaMaattaWithYou
They might not have a choice. Maatta is no head turner and Jarrys stock isn't what it was.


If anything, they'll wait till the offseason. Some cheaper LHD are McNabb (VGK) or Nurse (EDM), Gustafsson (CHI), Zadorov (COL), Hutton (VAN). Don't know if all would be better than Maatta, but they are cheaper.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 48
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: quinnjj
I think Tierney for Määttä would be a good start. Maybe JR can get Lahore too.


Id love Tierney for Maatta. Idk who Lahore is, but if you're referring to Lajoie, can't see him being moved.
5 févr. 2019 à 15 h 57
#18
FrankFurter48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 262
Mentions "j'aime": 65
I really think we can get Alex Pietrangelo from STL. They would have to take Pearson or Maatta and we'd have to send some 1st's and 2nd's. Putting him with Letang is liek TBL having Hedman and McDonagh or SJS having Burns and Karlsson. Puts our D up there with the top.
5 févr. 2019 à 19 h 14
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 1,292
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: FrankFurter48
I really think we can get Alex Pietrangelo from STL. They would have to take Pearson or Maatta and we'd have to send some 1st's and 2nd's. Putting him with Letang is liek TBL having Hedman and McDonagh or SJS having Burns and Karlsson. Puts our D up there with the top.


I think a lefty would benefit us more.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage