SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins Now amp Future

Créé par: B_Boy
Équipe: 2018-19 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2019
Publié: 19 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Gotta do something Donnie!
These trades are needed for now & future cap space for
signings
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3700 000 $
2650 000 $
2700 000 $
2700 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob
  3. Lauzon, Jérémy
Détails additionnels:
Bruins need a physical RW, Andersons the answer though I dont know if Columbus would make trade so got to sweeten the pot....if not trade less for Virtanen on Vancouver
2.
EDM
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
Bruins arent going to sign Krug so move him when he’s at his highest worth on contract tenure....later. Bruins get a top minutes guy with a nice contract. This also helps Carlo get some more Chara time and Chiarelli gets his offensive d-man
3.
STL
  1. Backes, David
  2. Fitzgerald, Ryan
  3. Heinen, Danton
Détails additionnels:
....alright. It’s worth a try. If not, definitely need to unload Backes in off season for anything
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $69 139 335 $774 000 $3 232 500 $10 360 665 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
789 167 $789 167 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Klefbom worth more than Krug alone
19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 40
#2
BeastMode5515
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,538
Mentions "j'aime": 416
Why did CF take away ratings? DONT TRADE DEBRUSK!! AND ESPECIALLY NOT DEBRUSK+ FOR THAT RETURN! God.
19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 43
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,769
Mentions "j'aime": 8,826
Modifié 19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 49
These are god awful.

Edmonton is on Krug’s no trade list.

Boston would not include Debrusk for Panarin now they are going to trade him with 2 good prospect for Anderson and a stiff. Right

Maroon sucks. Bad as Backes is he still outproduces Maroon, he’s a 4th liner.

The only thing you got right is they do need to move Backes. Highly unlikely it happens this year though.
BeastMode5515 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 45
#4
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Poehling
Klefbom worth more than Krug alone[/quote
...If so then no more than a prospect
19 janv. 2019 à 23 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: BeastMode5515
Why did CF take away ratings? DONT TRADE DEBRUSK!! AND ESPECIALLY NOT DEBRUSK+ FOR THAT RETURN! God.

...lol. I like Debrusk but got to give up something get something good. Josh Anderson scores, hits & will fight. Simmonds may be quick answer but we may not be able to pay him next year with all the new contracts to sign. Whatever Bruins do, we dont need another left winger or left shot anything...how about Jake Virtanen?
20 janv. 2019 à 0 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
These are god awful.

Edmonton is on Krug’s no trade list.

Boston would not include Debrusk for Panarin now they are going to trade him with 2 good prospect for Anderson and a stiff. Right

Maroon sucks. Bad as Backes is he still outproduces Maroon, he’s a 4th liner.

The only thing you got right is they do need to move Backes. Highly unlikely it happens this year though.

Krug, you got me there on trade. Where would you send him?
Panarin we cant afford him in 2019-2020 so thats stupid...do the math.
Maroon sucks on a suck team so I beg to differ. To move Backes, it “should” be done in off season with a prospect for some St. Louis style ribs
20 janv. 2019 à 0 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,769
Mentions "j'aime": 8,826
Quoting: B_Boy
Krug, you got me there on trade. Where would you send him?
Panarin we cant afford him in 2019-2020 so thats stupid...do the math.
Maroon sucks on a suck team so I beg to differ. To move Backes, it “should” be done in off season with a prospect for some St. Louis style ribs


Columbus and Boston discussed Panarin in the offseason. Bruins ended the discussions when Debrusk had to be included. I never said they should trade for him, learn to read.

Maroon has sucked everywhere unless he was with McDavid. He’s a waste of roster space.
BeastMode5515 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 27
DeBrusk IS the "Bruins now and future"
B_Boy a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
I agree, Debrusk is great! But the Bruins need a 2nd line RW not just for this season. There are plenty of LWs that can slot into Debrusks spot
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 34
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
1 star. I’m being generous. This is awful
B_Boy a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 37
#11
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
Columbus and Boston discussed Panarin in the offseason. Bruins ended the discussions when Debrusk had to be included. I never said they should trade for him, learn to read.

...Never said anything about who you would trade. Do you propose any?
I stated, “Panarin we cant afford him”. As in, the reason the trade never happened was because of money not Debrusk being untouchable. You really think Debrusk is untouchable?? Dont believe everything you read
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 39
#12
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Bcarlo25
1 star. I’m being generous. This is awful

Hey, something new. I’m tired of the Schenn & Simmonds proposals
20 janv. 2019 à 1 h 56
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,769
Mentions "j'aime": 8,826
Modifié 20 janv. 2019 à 2 h 1
Quoting: B_Boy


Nobody is untouchable. There is no such thing.

CBS would take Debrusk alone for Anderson/Letestu and laugh about it afterwards. I like how you say Anderson scores. Debrusk had 43 points as rookie. Anderson’s season high is 30. I would not mind Anderson for the 3rd line. His max value is a 2nd round pick and mid-level prospect or mid-round pick. Honestly would not go more than the 2nd.

Anderson, Virtananen, Maroon. I’m sensing a patern. Big, slow, unproductive, poor defensively.

Most posters try to rip the other team off. You are ripping off your own. Unique twist.
B_Boy a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2019 à 2 h 24
#14
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Gofnut999
Nobody is untouchable. There is no such thing.
Anderson, Virtananen, Maroon. I’m sensing a patern. Big, slow, unproductive, poor defensively.

Jake Virtanen is faster than you think. Also I believe Anderson is like Tom Wilson. He's not bad for a big, slow guy in play offs. Either way the Bruins need a physical top 6 player which they dont have.

Most posters try to rip the other team off. You are ripping off your own. Unique twist
....lol.
20 janv. 2019 à 2 h 43
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.
20 janv. 2019 à 3 h 2
#16
Démarrer sujet
B_Boy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 0
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.

I’ve seen some of your posts. Humor me...
20 janv. 2019 à 6 h 10
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: B_Boy
This is so wrong that idk if I even want to get into depth on it.

I’ve seen some of your posts. Humor me...


DeBrusk alone for Anderson is no good. DeBrusk has 4 less points in 8 less games and is 2yr younger than Anderson. Don't forget the pain in the ass Anderson was last year about singing and guess what, he's do for a contract after next season. Lauzon is part of the future core 4 of our defense with McAvoy, Carlo and Vaak. JFK I'm higher on than most people, but that's a different discussion.

Krug for Klefbom....well Krug has EDM on his No Trade list, so there's that. I wouldn't mind moving Krug, but it's for forward help. We have LHD that are waiting in the system and are NHL ready.

Finally the Maroon trade. Maroon was nearly put on waivers two weeks ago. Hes playing 10-11 minutes a night and has been awful. Boston isn't going to re-sign him, so your basically giving up a kid whose shown he can put up 47 point in the NHL + mid prospect just to get rid of Backes this season. If you wait till after Backes bonus gets paid out this summer then he becomes more attractive for a trade as he'll only be owed $5 million over the next 2 years.

On top of all this, your trades didn't make the team better and actually you made it worse. The team is currently 2 points out of being 2nd in the eastern conference.
Gofnut999 et B_Boy a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2019 à 10 h 57
#18
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Columbus trade is so freaking bad. Since CF took away the rating system, I'll create my own.

RATING = -5 STARS

REASONING: All trades are horrendous. The Columbus is absolutely horrendous. You're trading Jake DeBrusk + JFK + Lauzon for Josh Anderson. Like what? How did this cross your mind as a "good move". Letestu is an AHL scrub at this point. He holds no value. You still somehow grossly overpaid for both players in one trade.

Jake DeBrusk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Anderson
JFK + Lauzon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Letestu

Bruins Package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Jackets Package/return
Breakaway a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2019 à 7 h 18
#19
Bruins Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 80
Quoting: BreKel
Columbus trade is so freaking bad. Since CF took away the rating system, I'll create my own.

RATING = -5 STARS

REASONING: All trades are horrendous. The Columbus is absolutely horrendous. You're trading Jake DeBrusk + JFK + Lauzon for Josh Anderson. Like what? How did this cross your mind as a "good move". Letestu is an AHL scrub at this point. He holds no value. You still somehow grossly overpaid for both players in one trade.

Jake DeBrusk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Anderson
JFK + Lauzon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Letestu

Bruins Package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Jackets Package/return


I was going to do my own personal "Starsearch" rating of one quarter star, but I think your rating is more accurate. These are just plain terrible all around except for the Klefbom trade which wouldn't happen because it makes Edmonton worse. None of these are even close to fair.
BreKel a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2019 à 14 h 21
#20
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: B_Boy
Hey, something new. I’m tired of the Schenn & Simmonds proposals


Ya, it’s new because it’s really, really, really, dumb
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage