SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tampa trade from mmobley

Créé par: SammyT_51
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 nov. 2018
Publié: 3 nov. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Foote, Cal
  2. Johnson, Tyler
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
TBL
    Nylander (7x7)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2018
    2019
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de DAL
    2020
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2379 500 000 $66 183 333 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $13 316 667 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    787 500 $787 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    650 000 $650 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    3 nov. 2018 à 16 h 25
    #1
    TiBo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 445
    Mentions "j'aime": 154
    That is an offer I haven't seen for Nylander. Very reasonable. Would the teams trade in division though? Could Tampa afford Nylander?
    3 nov. 2018 à 16 h 28
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    GM Hockeysaurus Rex
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 14,152
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
    Quoting: TiBo23
    That is an offer I haven't seen for Nylander. Very reasonable. Would the teams trade in division though? Could Tampa afford Nylander?


    I got it from user named mmobley. I would try to do a series where we would see if they can fit him. I think that this trade would help both teams equally so I would think that if this is the deal with Tampa lets do it. AndI dont like trading within division but if its fair than why not
    TiBo23 a aimé ceci.
    3 nov. 2018 à 16 h 30
    #3
    TiBo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 445
    Mentions "j'aime": 154
    Quoting: SammyT_51
    I got it from user named mmobley. I would try to do a series where we would see if they can fit him. I think that this trade would help both teams equally so I would think that if this is the deal with Tampa lets do it. AndI dont like trading within division but if its fair than why not


    Very fair offer..
    3 nov. 2018 à 16 h 47
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 50
    Quoting: TiBo23
    That is an offer I haven't seen for Nylander. Very reasonable. Would the teams trade in division though? Could Tampa afford Nylander?


    Tampa would say no to that. No thanks Ahahaha stop overvaluing Nylander.
    3 nov. 2018 à 16 h 51
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    GM Hockeysaurus Rex
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 14,152
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
    Quoting: loganreid
    Tampa would say no to that. No thanks Ahahaha stop overvaluing Nylander.


    Stop undervaluying Nylander.. He is great and that offer is fair imo. 3C and D prospect and 2nd for Nylander..
    3 nov. 2018 à 17 h 0
    #6
    Log off the internet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 7,830
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,866
    Quoting: SammyT_51
    Stop undervaluying Nylander.. He is great and that offer is fair imo. 3C and D prospect and 2nd for Nylander..


    Johnson isn’t a 3C by any stretch of the imagination
    3 nov. 2018 à 17 h 1
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    GM Hockeysaurus Rex
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 14,152
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
    Quoting: Hedman77
    Johnson isn’t a 3C by any stretch of the imagination


    I just put that in his own words that he probably thinks Nylander is not good.. Johnson is great player!
    3 nov. 2018 à 17 h 20
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 1,679
    Mentions "j'aime": 381
    Sure, we need more star players with big $. We play with salary cap turned off.

    And TJ is definitely not 3C.
    Hedman77 a aimé ceci.
    5 nov. 2018 à 8 h 28
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 50
    Quoting: SammyT_51
    I just put that in his own words that he probably thinks Nylander is not good.. Johnson is great player!


    Comparing simple points stats, Nylander is a career 0.73 PPG and 0.75 last year.

    It's better than Johnson for sure, but not by some giant margin. Johnson is a career 0.67 PPG and 0.62 last season, and 0.77 this season thus far.

    For a comparable of Nazem Kadri who every Leafs fan thinks is the best 3C in the league (I live in the GTA, all they have done is praise him and the Leafs centre depth this offseason)
    Kadri is a career 0.64PPG, 0.69 last season, and 0.57 this year. His numbers and Johnsons are very comparable. Lots of people like to praise Kadri's defensive side of his game and I'll give him credit. He is better at faceoffs than Johnson. a comparable of 50.1% to Johnson's 48.7%, but many of Johnson's are taken shorthanded in the defensive zone compared to Kadri who has only taken shorthanded 2 over the past couple of seasons. Also to use an advanced statistic, of SAT percentages since they both get a lot of defensive weight on their lines, Johnsons SAT Percentages are 49.30% which is nothing great, but Kadri's is 48.95%, there's not a glaring difference between these 2.

    Overall what I'm saying is If you think Johnson isn't a 3C, then Kadri wouldn't be either. The margin between these 2 is very very slim if anything.

    So no it isn't a fair offer. I'd rather keep a 3C, Top Prospect, and 2nd Rounder over someone who is at best a top winger or 2C.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage