SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ranking Prospect Pools and the best 2 prospects from each

Créé par: STLBlues17
Équipe: 2018-19 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2018
Publié: 20 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
6079 500 000 $53 693 327 $0 $27 947 500 $25 806 673 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Hughes, Quinn
925 000 $925 000 $
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $
AD
RFA - 4
Hart, Carter
925 000 $925 000 $
894 167 $894 167 $
C
RFA - 4
894 166 $894 166 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
758 333 $758 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD
UFA - 3
Wahlstrom, Oliver
925 000 $925 000 $
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance710 000 $$710K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
894 167 $894 167 $
C
UFA - 4
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
Poehling, Ryan
925 000 $925 000 $
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 4
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
AG, C
UFA - 3
Makar, Cale
925 000 $925 000 $
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 4
761 666 $761 666 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Vesalainen, Kristian
925 000 $925 000 $
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 5
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 3
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Dellandrea, Ty
925 000 $925 000 $
900 000 $900 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
916 667 $916 667 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
833 333 $833 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD
RFA - 3
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance962 500 $$962K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Fabbro, Dante
925 000 $925 000 $
Kaprizov, Kirill
925 000 $925 000 $
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 5
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C
RFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Norris, Josh
925 000 $925 000 $
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
775 833 $775 833 $
C
RFA - 5
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG
RFA - 3
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 3
Samsonov, Ilya
925 000 $925 000 $
Alexeyev, Alexander
925 000 $925 000 $
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 août 2018 à 21 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Tampa and Dallas higher I think
20 août 2018 à 21 h 23
#2
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: BinooEater1
Tampa and Dallas higher I think


Nah, there's not much upside in Tampa despite the depth and Dallas is THIN after Heiskanen
20 août 2018 à 21 h 27
#3
Kings guru
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 589
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Gabe is the obvious #1 for us but that #2 is debatable! As for the list I'd definitely put Detroit higher, and I'd probably lower Philadelphia
20 août 2018 à 21 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Quoting: MT_11
Gabe is the obvious #1 for us but that #2 is debatable! As for the list I'd definitely put Detroit higher, and I'd probably lower Philadelphia


If your talking overall depth, it's hard to push Philadelphia outside of the top-3.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 30
#5
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
First of all, the pens best two prospects are Addison and Sprong, although Hallander is very good.

Second of all, the pens two prospects here should be at least 4 spots higher
20 août 2018 à 21 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: phillyjabroni
If your talking overall depth, it's hard to push Philadelphia outside of the top-3.


Quoting: phillyjabroni
If your talking overall depth, it's hard to push Philadelphia outside of the top-3.

Philly has crazy depth, but I'm not sure if they have a prospect in the top 30
20 août 2018 à 21 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: PenGoater99
First of all, the pens best two prospects are Addison and Sprong, although Hallander is very good.

Second of all, the pens two prospects here should be at least 4 spots higher

They aren't ranked individually and Pittsburgh has a WEAK group
20 août 2018 à 21 h 32
#8
Kings guru
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 589
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: phillyjabroni
If your talking overall depth, it's hard to push Philadelphia outside of the top-3.


I guess it depends on who you'd refer to as prospects for them. I can see why they'd get a high ranking, but I probably don't categorize the same guys as prospects as you would.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
I would probably put Kaut over Timmins as the number 2 in the Avs org.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 34
#10
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: coga16
I would probably put Kaut over Timmins as the number 2 in the Avs org.

I'm not sold on Kaut, but Timmins is phenomenal
20 août 2018 à 21 h 34
#11
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: STLBlues17
They aren't ranked individually and Pittsburgh has a WEAK group


It's not as bad as you think it is tf? Hallander, Sprong, Addison can all be top 3 prospects in most teams' systems, and Aston Reese is good as well
20 août 2018 à 21 h 35
#12
Next Gen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,334
Mentions "j'aime": 269
islanders and ottawa dont have good pools at all currently. 100% shouldn't be in the top 10, Also Pittsburgh has possibly the worst if not bottem 2 of prospect pools in the league and that is obvious after constantly giving up their 1sts.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 35
#13
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: PenGoater99
It's not as bad as you think it is tf? Hallander, Sprong, Addison can all be top 3 prospects in most teams' systems, and Aston Reese is good as well


None are 1st rounders
20 août 2018 à 21 h 35
#14
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: Bloodykisame
islanders and ottawa dont have good pools at all currently. 100% shouldnt be in the top 10


Educate yourself
20 août 2018 à 21 h 36
#15
Kings guru
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 589
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: coga16
I would probably put Kaut over Timmins as the number 2 in the Avs org.


Hard to give Kaut that #2 given his heart issues imo
20 août 2018 à 21 h 39
#16
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: STLBlues17
None are 1st rounders


So? What does draft position have to do with how good someone is?
awesome a aimé ceci.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 39
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: MT_11
Hard to give Kaut that #2 given his heart issues imo


those are very over blown. Had his "corrective surgery" and apparently he didnt even need one, it was more of a precautionary reason to put some teams "concerns" at ease. Hes fine and has a clean bill of heath now

Concerns about Kaut health, you would have the same about Timmins who apparently had an undiagnosed concussion in the OHL playoffs and now suffering from a ankle thing that he cant even deal with, he has to take the summer resting
20 août 2018 à 21 h 40
#18
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: PenGoater99
So? What does draft position have to do with how good someone is?


Quite a bit
20 août 2018 à 21 h 40
#19
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Bloodykisame
islanders and ottawa dont have good pools at all currently. 100% shouldn't be in the top 10, Also Pittsburgh has possibly the worst if not bottem 2 of prospect pools in the league and that is obvious after constantly giving up their 1sts.


Pittsburgh constantly gives up their 1st picks, yet they have a pretty decent pool. It's not as bad as you think. Addison, Hallander, Sprong can all be top 3 prospects in any teams' system
20 août 2018 à 21 h 41
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: STLBlues17
I'm not sold on Kaut, but Timmins is phenomenal


Kaut is a very toolsy player, I think he has more of impact potential that Timmins. Dont get me wrong TImmins is one hell of a prospect but he might be a little over hyped bc of all the WJC love and playing for a power house OHL team. I just see Kauts ceiling higher than Timmins but Timmis is probably more of a sure thing than Kaut
STLBlues17 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2018 à 21 h 41
#21
Kings guru
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 589
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: coga16
those are very over blown. Had his "corrective surgery" and apparently he didnt even need one, it was more of a precautionary reason to put some teams "concerns" at ease. Hes fine and has a clean bill of heath now


Ah. Gotcha lol. Didn't read much into it so I just took it as it possibly being a Dzierkals 2.0. Even better pick for the Avs now in my opinion
20 août 2018 à 21 h 42
#22
Démarrer sujet
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,240
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: coga16
Kaut is a very toolsy player, I think he has more of impact potential that Timmins. Dont get me wrong TImmins is one hell of a prospect but he might be a little over hyped bc of all the WJC love and playing for a power house OHL team. I just see Kauts ceiling higher than Timmins but Timmis is probably more of a sure thing than Kaut


That's fair
20 août 2018 à 21 h 43
#23
Kings guru
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 589
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: STLBlues17
Quite a bit


Seems contradictory given that a handful of guys on this list a) were considered stretches for the 1st round, or b) weren't 1st rounders at all
20 août 2018 à 21 h 44
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: MT_11
Ah. Gotcha lol. Didn't read much into it so I just took it as it possibly being a Dzierkals 2.0. Even better pick for the Avs now in my opinion


He has a very good Rantanen blocking the spot, but he has a 1st Line RW, Milan Hejduk type ceiling if he hits all his potential. Probably would never hit all his strides but still will be a good top 6 weapon
20 août 2018 à 21 h 44
#25
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: STLBlues17
Quite a bit


Whether or not someone is a first-round pick doesn't determine how good they are. For Example, Carter Hart wasn't a 1st round pick, Addison wasn't a 1st round pick, and they have the potential to become elite in their respective positions
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage