SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Major pipe dream, but how's the value, @mk458?

Créé par: jwink19
Équipe: 2019-20 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 7 août 2018
Publié: 7 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This clearly won’t happen, but I stole the basic framework from another ACGM.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
12 300 000 $
33 500 000 $
31 300 000 $
22 250 000 $
21 100 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
2925 000 $
Transactions
EDM
  1. Butcher, Will
  2. Hischier, Nico
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Reilly Walsh - D (at Harvard)
2019 1st round pick (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2021
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 433 333 $0 $542 500 $14 066 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C
RFA - 2
749 167 $749 167 $ (Bonis de performance42 500 $$42K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 août 2018 à 14 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 74
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Not close
7 août 2018 à 14 h 43
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 801
Mentions "j'aime": 162
I tried to duplicate the Tampa one that was posted. Can't get any better than this with what we have.
7 août 2018 à 15 h 0
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
This is a concept I spoke about a while back, is it even possible to trade for a super elite centre? I don't see it being a smart move. Whoever trades the star will lose 9 out of 10 times. The cost it would take to make the trade fair would be astronomical because you'll never get a player nearly as good as what you are giving up so you'd need huge quantity.

If we are talking about McDavid you'd need a centre who is younger than 21 years old who looks like he'll be a perennial allstar and defenceman who is 22 or under and looks like they'll win several norris trophies. Plus a 1st round pick or two. And once we are in that price range it starts to not make sense from a buyers standpoint.
7 août 2018 à 15 h 3
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 801
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: LoganOllivier
This is a concept I spoke about a while back, is it even possible to trade for a super elite centre? I don't see it being a smart move. Whoever trades the star will lose 9 out of 10 times. The cost it would take to make the trade fair would be astronomical because you'll never get a player nearly as good as what you are giving up so you'd need huge quantity.

If we are talking about McDavid you'd need a centre who is younger than 21 years old who looks like he'll be a perennial allstar and defenceman who is 22 or under and looks like they'll win several norris trophies. Plus a 1st round pick or two. And once we are in that price range it starts to not make sense from a buyers standpoint.


The guy who did the Tampa one went Point/Sergachev/Foote/1st and was told to add another 1st. I did the best I could to duplicate that with what I have to work with.
7 août 2018 à 16 h 43
#5
MK458
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Good start, but not nearly as close as the Tampa trade in my opinion. Just FYI to everyone saying "he won't be traded", the poster understands that. I think Sergachev is more valuable than Butcher because of his age and perceived ceiling. I suppose Hischier may have more value than point because of being drafted 1st overall, and he did have a really good first season. But I think Point is an excellent player too, so Hischier isn't that much more valuable IMO. Rielly Walsh doesn't nearly have the value that Foote does, so that's the real issue here
7 août 2018 à 17 h 26
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 801
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: mk458
Good start, but not nearly as close as the Tampa trade in my opinion. Just FYI to everyone saying "he won't be traded", the poster understands that. I think Sergachev is more valuable than Butcher because of his age and perceived ceiling. I suppose Hischier may have more value than point because of being drafted 1st overall, and he did have a really good first season. But I think Point is an excellent player too, so Hischier isn't that much more valuable IMO. Rielly Walsh doesn't nearly have the value that Foote does, so that's the real issue here


Replace Walsh with Ty Smith? I picked Walsh because he will likely be ready first.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage