SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I f*cken hate Toronto, but they are going to win the stanley cup in 2019...

Créé par: Chuckforit
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 juill. 2018
Publié: 18 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2679 500 000 $69 077 500 $2 550 000 $4 550 000 $10 422 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juill. 2018 à 16 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Not with that defense.
18 juill. 2018 à 17 h 20
#2
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Next year signing Matthews & Marner (+16-17M$)... One of Marner or Nylander need to be sacrificed otherwise you will need to rebuilt entirely your defense losing Gardiner & Hainsey!
18 juill. 2018 à 17 h 45
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,330
Toronto is in a great spot this coming season no doubt. The defense is a bit questionable but the offense is a scoring machine. The hard part for fans is knowing next season they are going to have to move someone significant to stay under the cap even if the cap is $81M which I suspect it will be.
18 juill. 2018 à 18 h 14
#4
Sens4life
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 805
Mentions "j'aime": 108
That is not a cup contending lineup.
18 juill. 2018 à 18 h 32
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,511
Mentions "j'aime": 22,673
Quoting: Goldendelicious
Not with that defense.


It's this foolish old talk just non factual. Leafs allowed eight more goals against last season than Washington. Now I don't think we will the Cup, but geez, where's your logic.
Eli a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2018 à 18 h 34
#6
GoCanada
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 4,173
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Defence is not at a high level, however, if you shipped Nylander to bring in an elite defenceman, they would win the cup easy
18 juill. 2018 à 18 h 35
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,511
Mentions "j'aime": 22,673
Notcccc
18 juill. 2018 à 18 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: palhal
It's this foolish old talk just non factual. Leafs allowed eight more goals against last season than Washington. Now I don't think we will the Cup, but geez, where's your logic.


If Andersen doesn't play out of mind last year, its a different story. FWIW, they were bottom 4 in shots against and thats more statically relevant as it highlights how good Andersen was. Bunch of boys running lost in their own zone. Defensive zone play is under the microscope far more in the playoffs and last year's series against Boston highlights what their D-core truly is.
18 juill. 2018 à 19 h 9
#9
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Goldendelicious
If Andersen doesn't play out of mind last year, its a different story. FWIW, they were bottom 4 in shots against and thats more statically relevant as it highlights how good Andersen was. Bunch of boys running lost in their own zone. Defensive zone play is under the microscope far more in the playoffs and last year's series against Boston highlights what their D-core truly is.


Not all shots have equal chances of scoring. How far out do they come from? Can the goalie see them coming? Do they get deflected from in front? Did the shooter get infinite time and space to plan and fake out the goalie, or just enough to flip the puck into his catching glove?

I actually think the number of goals a team gives up is a very good indicator of how effective a team's defense is.

There are a lot of recipes for a good team, but adding a #1 center who scores about a point a game in the NHL playoffs to a team that already made the NHL playoffs seems like a really obviously good idea. I don't know whether the Leafs will win the Cup, but this is the first time in my lifetime that they have a pretty good chance, and they should be fun to watch for a long time, either way.
18 juill. 2018 à 19 h 42
#10
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,920
Mentions "j'aime": 4,651
They're the Leafs ... they aren't gonna win the cup in 2019. Stop with the jokes. Sticking Out Tongue
18 juill. 2018 à 19 h 42
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,511
Mentions "j'aime": 22,673
Kinda strange that it always Andersen that "played out of his mind" when in factor, McIllerney had a much better GAA. And a gee, how were the Leafs that bad against Boston....it was a seven game series.
Leaf might have lost game seven anyways. But it bone head line match up (no centre on the ice) when Leafs lost a defensive zone face off when tied the scored four, four. At yes, Jake being Jake made two bone head plays later to lead to Bruin goal. Gardiner is not a Leaf in 2019/20.
18 juill. 2018 à 21 h 40
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Goldendelicious
If Andersen doesn't play out of mind last year, its a different story. FWIW, they were bottom 4 in shots against and thats more statically relevant as it highlights how good Andersen was. Bunch of boys running lost in their own zone. Defensive zone play is under the microscope far more in the playoffs and last year's series against Boston highlights what their D-core truly is.


I like how everyone talks about how bad the defense was against Boston. The offense was also bad too. Nylander and Matthews combining for 2 goals the entire series is another big reason why they didn't win. Their big guys didnt show up. The entire team sucked and Andersen was not good in game 7 either. I would obviously expect them to bounce back and have a much better run next year but the whole team is to blame against Boston other then maybe Marleau, Marner, Dermott, and Kapanen. Those guys actually showed up. Matthews and Nylander both sucked.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage