Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 138
With that trade suggestion, CHI is adding more than 7.5M$ of cap hit. They clearly can't do that, since they would be above the cap. Also, they already have 9M$ invested in Crawford and Ward...why would they want to take on Anderson's contract and salary?!? And why would a cap crunch team take on a bad contract like the Zack Smith's one?
This shows why you need to think a little bit and put yourself in the shoes of the receiving team in order to propose something that makes sense and that is not botched. I don't mean to be rude at all, just trying to show you where you might have neglected some thoughts. It happens a lot in here, people didn't think things through because they do their AGM in a hurry.