SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What *Should’ve* Happened This Offseason

Créé par: nobody
Équipe: 2018-19 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2018
Publié: 5 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
All explanations for trades are listed below. Ask me if you have any questions about the lines.

At the trade deadline, Gagner, Nilsson and MDZ would be shipped. Hutton too, if possible. Gaudette would slide into Gagner’s spot while Demko would take over in net. And if the Leafs haven’t found their coveted RHD by then either, we’d be ringing their phones every day asking if they’d like a certain Chris Tanev.

None of that happened, none of that will happen, but I’d like to hear your thoughts on all this
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 600 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Hughes, Quinn
3925 000 $
Nash, Riley
33 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
    Reverting two signings that should have never happened. While Beagle and Roussel provide some nice depth, grit, and leadership, they’re taking away spots from the likes of Leipsic/Goldobin/Gaudette/etc. If the Canucks are also serious about this rebuild and are *close* to being done in 3-4 years, these contracts are going to bite. The fact that there are NTCs on all years is even more hurtful. I understand there’s a market on these guys, and according the Vancouver media (Rick Dhailwal) 10 teams were interested in these guys which drove the price up. Saying that, a smart GM realizes when the market has driven the price too high and then walks away.
    2.
    VAN
      Riley Nash
      CBJ
        While giving Beagle and Roussel paydays, the Canucks had interest in Riley Nash yet decided to walk away. Nash signed a steal of a contract in Columbus (3 x 2.75). Vancouver could have easily given Beagle money to Riley Nash and it would’ve made much more sense. A 3 year, $3.25M contract would’ve been completely reasonable for a guy coming off a 41 point season in Boston and provides temporary center and PK depth. To please Jim Benning, I’m presuming he provides “grit” as well.
        3.
        VAN
        1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (COL)
        Détails additionnels:
        Colorado could use the extra center depth. At $2.5M, a healthy Sutter could be useful for Colorado. Emphasis on healthy. The 3rd rounder could be conditional, whereas if Sutter fails to play more than 60 or more games, the Pick turns into a 4th rounder. On the flip side of the coin, if Sutter puts up more than 35 points in his first season, the pick converts to a 2nd round pick. I used 2020 as the year since Colorado doesn’t have a 2019 4th.
        COL
        1. Sutter, Brandon (1 875 000 $ retained)
        Détails additionnels:
        It’s time for Brandon “franchise” Sutter to be shown the exit door. Retaining on him in order to receive value is a smart move considering the Canucks have cap space, and who would want to have Sutter at over $4M? This is part of what “weaponizing our cap space” means, FYI Jimbo.
        Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2019
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de WSH
        Logo de VAN
        2020
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de COL
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        2021
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        Logo de VAN
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2279 500 000 $61 134 513 $852 847 $3 912 500 $18 365 487 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
        AG
        UFA - 3
        4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
        C
        UFA - 5
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        AD
        UFA - 1
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
        C, AG
        UFA - 3
        Nash, Riley
        3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
        1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 2
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
        AG
        UFA - 1
        2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
        AD, C
        UFA - 2
        650 000 $650 000 $
        AG
        UFA - 1
        6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
        AG, AD
        NTC
        UFA - 4
        1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
        AG
        UFA - 2
        1 475 000 $1 475 000 $
        AD, AG, C
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        DG
        NTC
        UFA - 1
        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
        G
        UFA - 2
        Hughes, Quinn
        925 000 $925 000 $
        4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 3
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage