SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Best Lineup

Équipe: 2018-19 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2018
Publié: 17 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Best line up possible. Needs a RW
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1725 000 $
11 250 000 $
Boqvist, Adam
3925 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
Logo de ARI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2019
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
2020
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2378 000 000 $57 054 443 $0 $6 180 000 $20 945 557 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
821 666 $821 666 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
839 167 $839 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, C
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 937 500 $3 937 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
5 475 000 $5 475 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin 2018 à 11 h 47
#1
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Firstly, sign Grabner if you need a 1RW. Likely 30-goal scorer with capable defense. Matt Cane has him projected at 4 years/ 4.5 million (I gave him 6 million: that sounded low to me).
Otherwise:
1. Perlini isn't ready to be a 1LW. Bad possession stats and an unremarkable 17/13/30 statline last year. I'd probably have Keller and Stepan together: Stepan needs a scorer on his wing to perform at maximum effectiveness, while Galchenyuk can act as a scorer in addition to a playmaker.
2. I have Kruger as 3C and Cousins at 4C . There's a lot to e optimistic about with Strome, but he wasn't effective in the NHL last year and the Yotes don't have much reason to rush him. Kruger's got solid possession numbers in ultra-defensive usage, and provides a very strong checking centre.
3. Probably keep Goligoski as 2LD. His CF% and FF% are ugly, but a lot of that can be chalked up to his 44.9 oZs% last year. It's been more of an issue with his usage than him, and a good checking line can fix it IMO. He did also manage a very solid 12/23/35 offensive slashline.
4. Probably add another scorer on the wing (JVR/Neal are the best options if Grabner's signed). You've got a ton of cap space here, keep adding!
Otherwise, solid team. I'm constantly amazed by how little change the Yotes really need.
17 juin 2018 à 11 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 266
Mentions "j'aime": 61
This team really has a load of prospects and young guns. What's really missing is a veteran winger on the right side to help things out. Who knows, maybe there's a deal in the making for that.
17 juin 2018 à 13 h 11
#3
Démarrer sujet
Bickellai Khabibulin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 267
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: OshietheBeast
This team really has a load of prospects and young guns. What's really missing is a veteran winger on the right side to help things out. Who knows, maybe there's a deal in the making for that.


I thought Rick Nash would be ideal, maybe Pacioretty. But Nash will take a pay cut to play for a contender, and if the Coyotes want Pac, then they would have traded him for Domi.
17 juin 2018 à 13 h 24
#4
Démarrer sujet
Bickellai Khabibulin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 267
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
Firstly, sign Grabner if you need a 1RW. Likely 30-goal scorer with capable defense. Matt Cane has him projected at 4 years/ 4.5 million (I gave him 6 million: that sounded low to me).
Otherwise:
1. Perlini isn't ready to be a 1LW. Bad possession stats and an unremarkable 17/13/30 statline last year. I'd probably have Keller and Stepan together: Stepan needs a scorer on his wing to perform at maximum effectiveness, while Galchenyuk can act as a scorer in addition to a playmaker.
2. I have Kruger as 3C and Cousins at 4C . There's a lot to e optimistic about with Strome, but he wasn't effective in the NHL last year and the Yotes don't have much reason to rush him. Kruger's got solid possession numbers in ultra-defensive usage, and provides a very strong checking centre.
3. Probably keep Goligoski as 2LD. His CF% and FF% are ugly, but a lot of that can be chalked up to his 44.9 oZs% last year. It's been more of an issue with his usage than him, and a good checking line can fix it IMO. He did also manage a very solid 12/23/35 offensive slashline.
4. Probably add another scorer on the wing (JVR/Neal are the best options if Grabner's signed). You've got a ton of cap space here, keep adding!
Otherwise, solid team. I'm constantly amazed by how little change the Yotes really need.


My thinking is that, Keller is the playmaker to Gally the scorer. Perlini is wildly inconsistent, but hopefully he can step-on in the summer, he can become a strong scorer in the NHL, Stepan can be a stablising center for him.

Strome has definitely graduated the AHL, placing Merkley on his wing provides speed and familiar support. 3rd center is a good spot as he can be used and hidden when necessary.

Kruger is the dream 4th center, Lawson Crouse can become Andrew Shaw v2 alongside Kruger. Also Goligoski balances the D group, the bottom 4 getting near identical ice time.

I'm not fond of any of the UFA wingers available, especially past 2 or 3 years of their contract. This is what Todd Cordell says about Grabner. Its hard to argue against, and puts me off.

"Grabner is a useful middle-6 forward but I don't think he's as good as his goal totals over the last couple years suggest.
From 2009-16, his average shooting percentage at 5v5 was 9.82%. In two years with the Rangers it jumped to an unsustainably high 16.06%. The spike in shooting percentage, coupled with a plethora of empty net goals, have inflated his numbers and made him look like a much better scorer than he actually is. The New Jersey Devils found that out the hard way down the stretch.
Grabner has posted a negative Relative Corsi For% in four consecutive years, his goal scoring numbers will almost certainly dip, and he's on the wrong side of 30. Buying high on him seems like a bad idea."
17 juin 2018 à 13 h 59
#5
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Gally doesn't really need a playmaker: he can fill that role himself. Similarly, Keller can do a lot of the scoring himself. And I'm still iffy on Stepan without a more consistent scorer.
Strome's graduated the AHL, but his NHL sample was unimpressive. I'm iffy on him having a significant role. 4C's even easier to shelter, and I'd like to have a dedicated shutdown line to help shelter him.
Kruger is way overqualified for a 4C. Consistently good possession numbers in brutal usage. He's a really solid checker.
Grabner had 27 goals on 16.2% shooting in 3rd line minutes. He can score 30 if his QoT and TOI go up, even with sh% regression. For a guy like Grabner who falls into the category of "chance maker" from Alex Novet's goal scorer cluster analysis, 16.2% shooting isn't gonna regress brutally, with 13% being pretty reasonable. His poor possession stats are largely a function of bad teammates, and a career 43.7% oZs% (HEAVY defensive usage.) It's a safe bet that his assist numbers will increase too. Corsi Rel isn't perfect, and Grabner's very much the type of player it can underrate (heavy defensive usage with low QoT).
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage