I’d rant to you about how that was a sarcastic joke but I don’t want to sound like Brett

It has come to our attention that the correct process wasn't taken when reversing the earlier trades, therefore for now, the Kravtsov trade will stand @NateElder12 @jmac490, the Laine trade will stand @Zach @TrueNorth and the Wheeler trade will stand @TrueNorth @MacWinnon. We are going to revote on the trades and if it becomes apparent the deal is lopsided as previously thought, they will be given 7 DAYS to rework the trade and if a new agreement can't be come to, the deals will be null and void. Thanks for understanding and I'm truly sorry for the inconvenience I've caused partly from ignorance and partly from misunderstanding what had been stated in the rules.

It has come to our attention that the correct process wasn't taken when reversing the earlier trades, therefore for now, the Kravtsov trade will stand @ NateElder12 @ jmac490, the Laine trade will stand @ Zach @ TrueNorth and the Wheeler trade will stand @ TrueNorth @ MacWinnon. We are going to revote on the trades and if it becomes apparent the deal is lopsided as previously thought, they will be given 7 DAYS to rework the trade and if a new agreement can't be come to, the deals will be null and void. Thanks for understanding and I'm truly sorry for the inconvenience I've caused partly from ignorance and partly from misunderstanding what had been stated in the rules.

Many times i've made a joke and others act like i'm being serious ... i was actually kind of confused because i thought you meant you were leaving until September. I didn't go back and re-read the original post.

Our voting period has ended. We have voted 5-0 in favour of revision on the Kravtsov deal @NateElder12 @jmac490 and Wheeler deal @MacWinnon @TrueNorth. The Laine deal between @Zach and @TrueNorth received a 3-2 vote in favour of revision which is not enough to warrant an explanation period. The explanation periods will occur between tonight and tomorrow. Each person will receive ONE OPPORTUNITY to explain why the deal should stand and then another vote will take place. Thank you

The entire BOG must believe that the deal needs reconstruction for it to be notified.

I don't think that Laine deal even goes under a revision period. I can't tell if that's what your alluding to or if your just saying that they don't get a chance to explain it because it's already a done deal. Just need to clarify.

v5?

You mean v6, right?

I think he means lucky v7 if I'm correct.

VIII.

Am I doing it right?

It's IIV... idk what ur doing

Nino Niederreiter is available for a similar forward!
REQUIREMENT: Must be an RFA at the end of his contract, or must have at least five years left on it. (Sorry Max; not Milan Lucic)

ALEX KILLORN

No

Saad?

Nino Niederreiter is available for a similar forward!
REQUIREMENT: Must be an RFA at the end of his contract, or must have at least five years left on it. (Sorry Max; not Kailer Yamamoto)

MILAN LUCIC

Saad?

MILAN LUCIC

ANDREW LADD

I'd be Saad too if I had a forward bomb as hard as he did last year.

I mean a 25yr old, the guy is going to be right back to 50point markers. Everyone on Chicago had a down year.

NO (OR MATHEW BARZAL). Ok, maybe Josh Bailey, but unless you added something meaningful, that wouldn't be a good deal for me. He's not old, but he's not young either, which would make my Cup window close more quickly.