SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres if they wish to contend now

Créé par: FryesLeapMaine
Équipe: 2018-19 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2018
Publié: 29 avr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Better effort here this time buffalo fan. How did I do?

I specifically left cap room for the 3x Rfa in 2 seasons time. 15m should be enough for bridge deals.

Better goaltending and more scoring should erase two huge weaknesses. The defense also becomes more stabilized due to Guhle and Dahlin.

Give me what you got. If I failed i’ll Try again.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
86 000 000 $
3850 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 200 000 $
36 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Pick #1, Rasmus Dahlin
3925 000 $
Pick #2, Andrei svechnikov
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
    2018 2nd svechnikov

    Buffalo gets their stud 4th player. They could use one more but in this mock the strategy is to compete now.
    CAR
    1. Bailey, Justin
    2. Lehner, Robin
    3. O'Reilly, Ryan
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
    Détails additionnels:
    Ror = pick 10 or 12
    Lehner is a good starter who is used to getting shelled with a poor squad in front of him. He moves it up to pick 6.
    Bailey is an intrigueing Rw wh. Moves it up to pick 4.
    The 2019 2nd is likely a top 40 prospect. That moves it up 2 slots.
    Carolina gets all their needs filled.
    2.
    BUF
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (SJS)
    Détails additionnels:
    Kane resigns.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (SJS)
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2019
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2020
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2021
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2380 000 000 $68 195 357 $0 $1 882 500 $11 804 643 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Pick #2, Andrei svechnikov
    925 000 $925 000 $
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    650 000 $650 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Pick #1, Rasmus Dahlin
    925 000 $925 000 $
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    5 142 857 $5 142 857 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 avr. 2018 à 22 h 47
    #1
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,257
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    you have to fix your lineup a little bit to have players in correct position. i would bet you could pay less to Montreal and get 3rd pick to have a stud LW where buffalo is a little weaker.
    29 avr. 2018 à 23 h 1
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 972
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Quoting: jonnymc26
    you have to fix your lineup a little bit to have players in correct position. i would bet you could pay less to Montreal and get 3rd pick to have a stud LW where buffalo is a little weaker.


    It’d get unrealistic with the amount of trades to use mtl. Lehner would have to go somewhere else.

    I think a lw would help too, but svechnikov is better imo. I personally believe they are about even at Rw and lw honestly. Is Reinhart really going to be enough to carry Okposo to be more valuable a year fromnow compared to Nylander and Smith? I’m uncertain of that.... Nylander has high upside and every buf fan is raving about Smith.
    30 avr. 2018 à 0 h 4
    #3
    Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 6,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
    Trading O'Reilly for #2 overall makes no sense for either Carolina or Buffalo in my opinion. Especially if Buffalo is going to pay Bozak 6 million when for 1.5 million more O'Reilly is 100 times better. Buffalo can get a much better more useful package for O'Reilly. I don't know if my argument is making sense, but the last thing Buffalo needs is to draft another forward in round 1. I would restructure the Carolina trade to get Hanifin for ROR or Bean and Skinner. Something to help Buff win now. I'll probably make a post about it.
    30 avr. 2018 à 0 h 11
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 972
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Quoting: NickC1988
    Trading O'Reilly for #2 overall makes no sense for either Carolina or Buffalo in my opinion. Especially if Buffalo is going to pay Bozak 6 million when for 1.5 million more O'Reilly is 100 times better. Buffalo can get a much better more useful package for O'Reilly. I don't know if my argument is making sense, but the last thing Buffalo needs is to draft another forward in round 1. I would restructure the Carolina trade to get Hanifin for ROR or Bean and Skinner. Something to help Buff win now. I'll probably make a post about it.


    That’s not happening. Hanifin is much better than ror imo same with bean and skinner. The whole point of the trade is to make Car compete now while buf rebuilds. That’s the general direction each should take.
    30 avr. 2018 à 0 h 17
    #5
    Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 6,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
    Quoting: FryesLeapMaine
    That’s not happening. Hanifin is much better than ror imo same with bean and skinner. The whole point of the trade is to make Car compete now while buf rebuilds. That’s the general direction each should take.


    Bean and Skinner for ROR makes a lot of sense and would be closest to fair, but the more I look at it the less sense it makes for Buffalo to move ROR when they'll need a 2C.
    30 avr. 2018 à 0 h 30
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 504
    Mentions "j'aime": 191
    Quoting: FryesLeapMaine
    That’s not happening. Hanifin is much better than ror imo same with bean and skinner. The whole point of the trade is to make Car compete now while buf rebuilds. That’s the general direction each should take.


    I think Hanifin is getting overrated a bit around here. Don't get me wrong, he's a good player with great potential, but there are a lot of holes in his defensive game still. He isn't trusted yet with tough matchups in Carolina, and he's still their #4 defenseman in TOI.
    O'Reilly is a very good 2C and possibly an average 1C with decent linemates, he's a poor man's Bergeron. He gets an incredibly tough workload and all the important D zone faceoffs, which takes all sorts of pressure off of Eichel and the rest of the team. And he consistently puts up around 60 points with generally weak linemates. Dude's a workhorse, and he'd leave a gaping hole in the roster if we traded him.
    30 avr. 2018 à 19 h 40
    #7
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,257
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    Quoting: FryesLeapMaine
    It’d get unrealistic with the amount of trades to use mtl. Lehner would have to go somewhere else.

    I think a lw would help too, but svechnikov is better imo. I personally believe they are about even at Rw and lw honestly. Is Reinhart really going to be enough to carry Okposo to be more valuable a year fromnow compared to Nylander and Smith? I’m uncertain of that.... Nylander has high upside and every buf fan is raving about Smith.


    Nylander is a natural RW and has just been used as LW under Smith because they are weeker on LW. cap friendly cant show full scope of players it be to much info, you just have to watch or already know lol. it also says Cliff pu is RW but he is a center and just happened to shift to a wing after a trade.
    30 avr. 2018 à 21 h 15
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 972
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Quoting: jonnymc26
    Nylander is a natural RW and has just been used as LW under Smith because they are weeker on LW. cap friendly cant show full scope of players it be to much info, you just have to watch or already know lol. it also says Cliff pu is RW but he is a center and just happened to shift to a wing after a trade.


    ? Nylander plays Lw if svechnikov is taken... I don’t understand your point....
    30 avr. 2018 à 22 h 49
    #9
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,257
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    Quoting: FryesLeapMaine
    ? Nylander plays Lw if svechnikov is taken... I don’t understand your point....


    then he is half the player he could be and will always be shooting and playing on his offside. its how you screw up potential (hints his terrible numbers this year).
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage