SalarySwishSalarySwish

Next Season

Créé par: Earth
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 26 sept. 2018
Publié: 26 sept. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Breadman returns
Dzingel plays for his home town.
Boqvist has potential to be in the lineup.

Gain a struggling forward in Ryan while losing a struggling d man. Can be rewarding if he plays like he did during 2017 playoffs. Either way this frees up cap space faster than with seabs contract.

Robin Lehner has posted a .916 during his time in buffalo. Imagine what he can do with a team in front of him.


Then for the 20-21 season we have to resign debrincat. Theres about 4 mil to spend. Plus roughly 2 mil the cap will increase. Crawford contract ends, he won't be getting 6 mil again with all these injury stuff going on. I think that is safe to say we will have enough to resign him. And if he wants a high number, we can likely sign him to a bridge deal with Kane toews and Ryan's contract expiring.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
58 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
    Picks/prospects at 2019 deadline. Team unknown.
    2.
    CHI
      For whatever with whoever. 2019 deadline
      3.
      CHI
      1. Ryan, Bobby
      Détails additionnels:
      Ryan Dzingel. During 2018-19 season.

      Sens finally get rid of Ryan's contract (3 years) but take on Seabs lower contract (5 years). Seabrook joins an obsolete d group and mentors young players.
      OTT
      1. Saad, Brandon
      2. Seabrook, Brent
      Détails additionnels:
      Throw in picks and prospects as necessary.

      I wouldn't give up 1st round, Boqvist or jokiharju. But whatever it takes to get rid of Seabrook. Seabrook would have to waive his NMC but maybe they do some insider stuff we don't know about.
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2021
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2022
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $69 774 294 $0 $3 415 000 $11 725 706 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      AD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 1
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      750 000 $750 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
      DD
      RFA - 2
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      706 666 $706 666 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      900 000 $900 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      800 000 $800 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner

      Commentaires populaires

      26 sept. 2018 à 23 h 0
      #1
      Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 6,991
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
      I feel like Chicago loses that Ottawa deal just because Saad was supposed to be and is still considered to be an important piece.
      26 sept. 2018 à 23 h 8
      #2
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,786
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
      Quoting: NickC1988
      I feel like Chicago loses that Ottawa deal just because Saad was supposed to be and is still considered to be an important piece.


      I don’t like to advertise, but why don’t you go check out my last post and see if that’s better. I agree that’s to much to give up while taking Ryan back.
      26 sept. 2018 à 23 h 19
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2018
      Messages: 801
      Mentions "j'aime": 162
      Melnyk is too cheap for that deal. He only saves 375K on the Ryan/Seabrook difference and has to pay Seabs an extra two years. Plus the 6 mil tag on Saad.
      27 sept. 2018 à 1 h 34
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 828
      Mentions "j'aime": 715
      aa
      27 sept. 2018 à 1 h 40
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 828
      Mentions "j'aime": 715
      Modifié 27 sept. 2018 à 2 h 8
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I don’t like to advertise, but why don’t you go check out my last post and see if that’s better. I agree that’s to much to give up while taking Ryan back.


      I don't see them taking Seabrook's contract without us taking on Ryan's. We get rid of that cap space in three years compared to what would be five. Get him out of Ottawa to reboot his career, he has the potential to be a 20 goal scorer, 50+ points again. He is similar to Saad in terms of production, they were actually 2 points apart last season while Ryan played 20 less games. And imagine if Ryan plays like his old self. 2017 he had a terrible season but in playoffs he produces 15 points in 19 games, showing he still has it. Even if he doesn't produce those numbers, I would rather have a struggling forward at that cap hit than a struggling defensemen. We have a ton of defense prospects and there will be no room for Seabrook in the lineup the way he's been playing. And for Saad, he is not as advertised and he will disappoint yet again this season in my opinion. Bringing back old pieces hasn't worked all these times Bowman has done it. I don't see it working with Saad. Getting rid of him frees up the cap space for Panarin. Who I think we all agree, we'd love to have back. Also, Dzingel is on the come up, he will be a great sign for whoever gets him if he hits free agency this upcoming offseason.
      Voir tout