SalarySwishSalarySwish

Mark Pysyk at the TDL

Créé par: mytduxfan
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2018
Publié: 27 janv. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Mark Pysyk had a strong season for FLA last year, but has fallen off a little this year. He's only 26, on a good contract and would be pretty ideal for ANA as a top 4 guy this season, allowing Fowler to take more of an offensive role by reducing his baby-sitting duties because of Bieksa, and then could slide into that RD position on the 3rd pairing next season:

Lindholm - Montour
Fowler - Manson
Larsson - Pysyk

Not sure about price. It's probably overkill with Roy in the deal. I'm just not sure how attached FLA is to Pysyk.

Welinkski = NHL ready offensive RD stuck behind a deep defensive core. Would be a good addition to any team. Not the biggest or most physical guy, but a good skater with a great shot. Just needs a chance now and that probably isn't happening in ANA.

Roy = NHL ready LW/RW. Again, just needs an opportunity and I don't see that happening in ANA. We have too many similar players in Kase, Cogs, Brown, etc. Scored 6 goals and 7 pts in 25 games for the big club, with most of those coming later on in his stint. He's visibly improved whilst being with the team. Hence, I'm sure most other Duck fans won't want to move him. However, whilst I think Roy has a great NHL career ahead of him, I just don't think it's with ANA.

Would rather add Roy to the deal to keep the pick low personally, but others may be willing to give up a 2nd to keep Roy out the deal.

Thoughts?
Transactions
FLA
  1. Roy, Kevin
  2. Welinski, Andy
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NJD
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 000 000 $65 950 917 $0 $1 550 000 $9 049 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
670 000 $670 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 733 333 $2 733 333 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance700 000 $$700K)
DG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

27 janv. 2018 à 10 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
I think it may be better to not include Roy and sub in a pick for him. Reason being that come playoff time, Depth is needed. We saw that in the series against Nashville. Ducks has no depth. We need a guy like Roy so if someone does go down, we have a viable replacement and aren’t putting in a Jared Boll Type guy. Overall, I like the idea of adding another defenseman. Pysyk works. Would love to see Fowler-Manson and Lindholm-Montour as pairings eventually because I feel Fowler could use a defensively responsible partner. Montour would get the same sturdy partner in Lindholm.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2018 à 14 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
I think it may be better to not include Roy and sub in a pick for him. Reason being that come playoff time, Depth is needed. We saw that in the series against Nashville. Ducks has no depth. We need a guy like Roy so if someone does go down, we have a viable replacement and aren’t putting in a Jared Boll Type guy. Overall, I like the idea of adding another defenseman. Pysyk works. Would love to see Fowler-Manson and Lindholm-Montour as pairings eventually because I feel Fowler could use a defensively responsible partner. Montour would get the same sturdy partner in Lindholm.


That's a great point. Roy could certainly come in handy were someone to go down on the LW. Would be nice to hear what FLA fans have to say, but oh well.
Voir tout