SalarySwishSalarySwish

Yzerplan

Créé par: SlafCaufZuki
Équipe: 2024-25 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 30 mai 2024
Publié: 30 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 850 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
68 250 000 $
21 375 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
28 000 000 $
43 750 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
DET
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (UTA)
2.
DET
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur [Droits de RFA]
LAK
  1. Berggren, Jonatan [Droits de RFA]
3.
DET
  1. Merzlikins, Elvis (2 700 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
4.
DET
  1. Trouba, Jacob (2 500 000 $ retained)
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DET)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
5.
DET
    FC
    CHI
    1. Holl, Justin
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DET)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de DET
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de NJD
    2025
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de STL
    2026
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de DET
    Logo de UTA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 700 000 $86 872 640 $0 $1 850 000 $827 360 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    878 333 $878 333 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    905 833 $905 833 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    900 000 $900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    RFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    30 mai à 10 h 53
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 4,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,150
    No deal. I would rather buy out Elvis than retain and give up an asset.
    30 mai à 11 h 4
    #2
    Nah.
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,668
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,696
    Quoting: Jacketsman61
    No deal. I would rather buy out Elvis than retain and give up an asset.


    Half retention equates to roughly $7.88M in total dollars over three years; buy-out cost is $10.95 over six. I understand the relative cap hits are very different over that time, but its still a difference of $1.6M, $1M, and -$200k over three with retention, and I don't see us being in a cap crunch over that time (partiuclarly with an increasing cap lowering the % hit of the retention). Frankly, a half retained trade is probably the overall best route, IMO. The difference would be adding the cost of a Elvis replacement, which is either Husso or some low-level guy from the UFA heap; so, admittedly, reviewing the cost here will have to factor that price in.

    That being said, with half retention, I dont think I'm adding an asset to the trade. Elvis was just as good (bad) as Husso last year Best case, Elvis bounces back and DET has a starter; and worst case DET is getting a guy who is not a bad value as a back-up at the price.

    The buy-out would also be hilariously cheap.
    30 mai à 11 h 15
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 3,547
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
    Quoting: dopplsan
    Half retention equates to roughly $7.88M in total dollars over three years; buy-out cost is $10.95 over six. I understand the relative cap hits are very different over that time, but its still a difference of $1.6M, $1M, and -$200k over three with retention, and I don't see us being in a cap crunch over that time (partiuclarly with an increasing cap lowering the % hit of the retention). Frankly, a half retained trade is probably the overall best route, IMO. The difference would be adding the cost of a Elvis replacement, which is either Husso or some low-level guy from the UFA heap; so, admittedly, reviewing the cost here will have to factor that price in.

    That being said, with half retention, I dont think I'm adding an asset to the trade. Elvis was just as good (bad) as Husso last year Best case, Elvis bounces back and DET has a starter; and worst case DET is getting a guy who is not a bad value as a back-up at the price.

    The buy-out would also be hilariously cheap.


    If we are taking back Husso then there should be an asset coming back to the jackets. I think at 1.4 million retention Elvis has positive value. Especially since he would be the best goalie on the free agent market if bought out. 2.7 million for a starting goaltender is ridiculously cheap. I’d rather just keep him for another year and see if he can rebound his value behind what should be a better team.
    dopplsan et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    30 mai à 11 h 56
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 9,676
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,129
    Hawks probably accept
    PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
    30 mai à 12 h 8
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 1,993
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,302
    Quoting: SK101
    If we are taking back Husso then there should be an asset coming back to the jackets. I think at 1.4 million retention Elvis has positive value. Especially since he would be the best goalie on the free agent market if bought out. 2.7 million for a starting goaltender is ridiculously cheap. I’d rather just keep him for another year and see if he can rebound his value behind what should be a better team.


    I'm sorry but your response just doesn't make any sense. First off, Husso's numbers are actually better than Elvis over the last two years, second goalies don't get good returns and third goalies with sub 900 save percentages dont have value at any salary. This deal seems painful but fair for both sides. You want an asset how about 2029 7th rounder?
    rednwhite a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout