SalarySwishSalarySwish

Game 3 lineup changes and reasoning

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Bruins lack of talent is glaring after game 2. That was with Marner not producing and Nylander out... B's are in for a tough series if they want to win. Here are some changes I'd make to the lineup:

1: Heinen does not work on 1LW. He was a PTO singing, cool story for the regular season, but he's a bottom 6 guy. This won't work in the playoffs. The Frederic/Geekie/Lauko line is struggling to produce (obviously) so it's a low risk move to put Frederic on 1LW. Worth a shot, low risk moderate reward.

2: Ullmark was great, so the rotation is on!

3: Peeke is out for the series in my mind. You don't just get hit in the hand and not come back, that has to be a broken finger or broken hand. Luckily Wotherspoon has played decent, so he seems like the obvious replacement for the series/playoffs. If Peeke is back sooner, cool, but not getting my hopes up on that...

4: Fourth line also not gonna produce much, so Boqvist might be able to elevate his skill with Heinen and Geekie. That's a capable third line. Not great, but capable for sure. Lauko isn't a top 9 forward, so I do think taking him off that line helps offensively. He and Beecher can make up for Maroons lack of speed as well.

5: Grzelcyk and Shattenkirk have short leashes imo, so if they lose game 3 or one of them plays poorly, Lohrei is in for game 4. His offensive production is better than those two, even if defense is roughly equal. No brainer for me in this situation, but I'd be fairly patient with this since I do think Griz/Shat have slightly higher ceilings defensively. 3 games is a good enough sample size for me.

6: Stick to the basics! Toronto will win 10/10 times if it comes down to a skill focused game. Keep it simple, get to inside ice, and actually challenge Samsonov. Relying on Ullmark/Swayman to bail you out in high danger scoring chances isn't sustainable. Toronto WILL generate more, it's ok to accept that, but don't let it get out of hand like game 2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $84 883 334 $4 500 000 $0 $-1 383 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

23 avr. à 9 h 41
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,574
Mentions "j'aime": 7,390
this is a ridiculous over reaction. calm down pal. the leafs needed an allyoop goal, a whacky bounce off a stantion, and a quasi soft PP to score last night. The bruins were certainly outplayed, but there is no reason to make a change with the possible exception of Wotherspoon for Grzelcyk.
23 avr. à 9 h 47
#2
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 728
Mentions "j'aime": 170
Quoting: Bcarlo25
this is a ridiculous over reaction. calm down pal. the leafs needed an allyoop goal, a whacky bounce off a stantion, and a quasi soft PP to score last night. The bruins were certainly outplayed, but there is no reason to make a change with the possible exception of Wotherspoon for Grzelcyk.


These are very minor changes, and not changing anything that was working anyways, I wouldn't even take out Griz yet lol
23 avr. à 9 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 242
Mentions "j'aime": 79
This series is making me realize there's a huge difference between guys who are skilled and guys who are game-breakers. On paper, Leafs should be way more skilled, and yet both teams have the same amount of game-breakers:

TOR: Matthews, Nylander, Reilly, Tavares*
BOS: Pastrnak, Marchand, McAvoy, Ullmark/Swayman* (can only play 1 at a time)

With that in mind, I really don't think you guys need to change much. To me, the game did NOT feel as one-sided as people are making it seem to be.
23 avr. à 9 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,629
Mentions "j'aime": 5,472
Too many changes and three new lines. Heinen isn't a top6 F, but Frederic is? Especially when he hasn't played with 18-88? There was a time to try Lohrei on the 3rd pair, they didn't and he can't play in the top4 either.
23 avr. à 10 h 6
#5
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 728
Mentions "j'aime": 170
Quoting: DeclanLovesHockey
This series is making me realize there's a huge difference between guys who are skilled and guys who are game-breakers. On paper, Leafs should be way more skilled, and yet both teams have the same amount of game-breakers:

TOR: Matthews, Nylander, Reilly, Tavares*
BOS: Pastrnak, Marchand, McAvoy, Ullmark/Swayman* (can only play 1 at a time)

With that in mind, I really don't think you guys need to change much. To me, the game did NOT feel as one-sided as people are making it seem to be.


Yeah, fair point. The game was lopsided as far as high danger chances go for sure. Ullmark bailed them out of what could've easily been a 6-2 game. Toronto led in scoring chances 27-12. Possession didn't seem too lopsided but quality chances definitely were, leafs team defense was excellent
Voir tout