SalarySwishSalarySwish

Time To Move On

Créé par: graderman
Équipe: 2017-18 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 1 nov. 2017
Publié: 1 nov. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Although I doubt Seabrook will ever waive his NMC for personal reasons, I could see this trade because of Uncle Dale. He may want the Hawks to retain salary or add a relatively high pick as Seabrook is really showing his limitations on the ice. Both Bjugstad and Petrovic seem to have diminished roles with the Panthers and could be moved. Chicago would benefit in acquiring a young RH center who is winning face-offs. In Petrovic, he would basically be platooning with Murphy I believe. As for the new lines, the top nine would certainly have very nice balance in hopes that production would also be evident. A pipe dream of moving an anchor contract but here's to hoping!
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 000 000 $60 210 628 $3 558 000 $1 457 500 $14 789 372 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AD, C
UFA - 2
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, C
NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
872 500 $872 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

1 nov. 2017 à 22 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 56
The primary issue with trading Seabrook is the contract of course. It's a lot of years at a fairly big cap hit for a player already at 32. The GM trading for him would have to believe that Seabrook is the missing piece to a Stanley Cup, and think the window will be open for a few years for them. Otherwise, why take on this potentially bad contract when one can make an equally bad contract on a younger player next off-season?
The secondary issue is, and this might be why Stan signed him to the deal, who else do they have to take on Seabrook's role as the big Dman (6'3", 220, 100+ hits & blocks)? It's great to think the contract is the problem, but isn't the real problem they're thin at the blue line?
7 nov. 2017 à 15 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
RD, I absolutely agree with what you said in regards to Seabrook. He, like several other Hawks, has an unmovable contract for his worth. That is why the only GM who might trade for him would be Tallon. I said this at the time on another site, Seabrook would have been a better guy to trade than Sharp in '15. Stephen Johns could be a comparable defensively to Seabrook right now and at a fraction of his hit. This season, Rutta and Franson are better offensively than Seabrook, and also at a fraction of his hit. The only other recourse Chicago has now, is buying out Brent Seabrook because he will never waive NMC or retire early so the Hawks can move on from his declined performance.
Voir tout