SalarySwishSalarySwish

retool

Créé par: noted
Équipe: 2024-25 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 12 mars 2024
Publié: 12 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
STL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de NYI
2025
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2026
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $82 723 095 $0 $412 500 $4 976 905 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
835 833 $835 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
852 500 $852 500 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

12 mars à 16 h 55
#1
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,836
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).
jfkst1 a aimé ceci.
12 mars à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 929
Modifié 12 mars à 18 h 12
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).


I could agree with this. I almost want to do complete rebuild and trade everyone but Thomas and 1st / 2nd year players but don’t think Blues will ever do that.
TheEarthmaster a aimé ceci.
12 mars à 18 h 14
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 929
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).


The Blues will have $11M to do something with. Wouldn't be the worst thing if they didn't spend to cap next season...
12 mars à 18 h 27
#4
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,836
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: noted
The Blues will have $11M to do something with. Wouldn't be the worst thing if they didn't spend to cap next season...


So that's the thing- people are always like "oh well the Blues can't possibly afford to go through a rebuild financially" and I'm sure on some sense there may be truth to that given that the playoffs is where smaller market teams make most of their money. Even two home games can have a big impact on the bottom line.

But an easy way to make missing the playoffs multiple years in a row (as seems likely to be happening this year) much more affordable is not spending to the cap every year. Bank that 11 million for the future. For awhile this team NEVER spent to the cap, and so the Stillman group has made a big show of being guys that spend to the cap every year. And that's fantastic when the team needs to make big moves. But there are plenty of times when spending to the cap doesn't make sense, and I think unless they're getting payed in the form of picks or prospects to take on onerous deals from other teams right now is probably one of those times.

I liked their low-risk bets on Vrana and Kapanen, Hayes less so because of his term but like he's been fine. But it's hard to square "they have no money for a rebuild" with them spending 9 million on those three guys this year for basically no noticeable improvement in the standings compared to last year.
noted a aimé ceci.
Voir tout