SalarySwishSalarySwish

If the Caps really wanna sell

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2024
Publié: 26 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Carrier, Alexandre (1 250 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Ceci, Cody
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 579 167 $850 000 $4 200 000 $920 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 févr. à 16 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,341
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Make it Campbell, 24 first and 26 first and you have a deal
NARC311 et NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 16 h 36
#2
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 1,300
Quoting: Logicalicesports
Make it Campbell, 24 first and 26 first and you have a deal


Yeah I'd be ok with that honestly
Logicalicesports a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 16 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 644
Mentions "j'aime": 274
That's a lot of assets to give up to move from one struggling goalie to another (obvs Campbell is struggling more).
It could backfire MASSIVELY and end up with us moving all that to get the same results in buying out Kuemper.

Also you're overpaying a bit on the Carrier trade.
27 févr. à 13 h 0
#4
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 1,300
Quoting: PurpleHippo
That's a lot of assets to give up to move from one struggling goalie to another (obvs Campbell is struggling more).
It could backfire MASSIVELY and end up with us moving all that to get the same results in buying out Kuemper.

Also you're overpaying a bit on the Carrier trade.


I feel like we have better odds with Kuemper bouncing back, he would play tandem with Skinner well and wouldn't have to be overplayed which is positive since his biggest issue is staying healthy. He's consistently been pretty damn good while Campbell kinda only had the 2-3 years of solid play. I trust that Kuemper can be a good partner to Stu even if the risk is high considering the assets.

With the Carrier trade it just depends on your thoughts on Ceci. Bourgault + the 2nd essentially equals a late first in value and Ceci is worth around a 4th in my mind. Carrier will also be cheap enough to re-sign in my mind making this deal worth it.
27 févr. à 13 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 644
Mentions "j'aime": 274
Quoting: NucksnOilers
I feel like we have better odds with Kuemper bouncing back, he would play tandem with Skinner well and wouldn't have to be overplayed which is positive since his biggest issue is staying healthy. He's consistently been pretty damn good while Campbell kinda only had the 2-3 years of solid play. I trust that Kuemper can be a good partner to Stu even if the risk is high considering the assets.

With the Carrier trade it just depends on your thoughts on Ceci. Bourgault + the 2nd essentially equals a late first in value and Ceci is worth around a 4th in my mind. Carrier will also be cheap enough to re-sign in my mind making this deal worth it.


Kuemper to me is pretty scary, again thinking of it in the worst way you're giving up a 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 2 1sts for a guy that may not change anything for EDM and cost more in cap.
Skinner has proven he is a legit starter and does well in a ~50-60 game season, I don't see a reason to get a tandem guy and would more so want a backup (though this is just my opinion).
Plus if we just buy out Campbell we save a decent amount of cap moving forward for other areas of need.

Carrier trade is off by a little to me, I think I value XB higher than you perhaps, but tbh if that's what got it done I wouldn't be too upset.
Voir tout