SalarySwishSalarySwish

stanley cup champions

Créé par: ural740811
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2024
Publié: 30 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 79
Saison restante: 41%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 82 825 830 $
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lindholm, Elias
11 212 500 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Akey, Beau
  2. Bourgault, Xavier
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
3-way trade
2.
EDM
    Lindholm, Elias ($1,212,500 retained)
    CBJ
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    Détails additionnels:
    From CGY: Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)

    3-way trade
    3.
    EDM
    1. Johnson, Erik (1 625 000 $ retained)
    BUF
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
    4.
    EDM
    1. Carrick, Sam (425 000 $ retained)
    ANA
    1. Mazura, Tomas [Liste de réserve]
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de NSH
    2025
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2026
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $81 798 557 $850 000 $4 200 000 $1 701 443 $
    Masse salariale proratée

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $2 108 724 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $5 143 229 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $2 263 021 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $2 108 724 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $3 497 396 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Lindholm, Elias
    1 212 500 $498 893 $
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $1 131 510 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 100 000 $864 063 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $318 880 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 000 000 $411 458 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $380 599 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    900 000 $370 313 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    0 $0 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $318 880 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    9 250 000 $3 805 990 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    -1 125 000 $-462 891 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 600 000 $1 069 792 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $2 468 750 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 900 000 $1 604 688 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $313 737 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $1 131 510 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $313 737 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 625 000 $668 620 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    30 janv. à 4 h 22
    #1
    Dekesaladekes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 3,064
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,107
    Where’s the value for Lindholm?
    If you think a late 1st, Aket, Bourgeault and ceci who is a cap dump + a 5th is enough to strip your biggest rival of Lindholm (twice retained) + Tanev (50% retained) you are very wrong.

    For lindholm and Tanev Calgary will bleed you dry.
    30 janv. à 4 h 39
    #2
    ural740811
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 669
    Mentions "j'aime": 61
    Quoting: Dekes
    Where’s the value for Lindholm?
    If you think a late 1st, Aket, Bourgeault and ceci who is a cap dump + a 5th is enough to strip your biggest rival of Lindholm (twice retained) + Tanev (50% retained) you are very wrong.

    For lindholm and Tanev Calgary will bleed you dry.


    What are you talking about?
    My friend, watch at least one Ceci game and at least once bother to look at Ceci's statistics to argue that this is a cap reset. You show absolute ignorance of the basic concepts of the game if you come to such absurd statements.
    30 janv. à 5 h 7
    #3
    Dekesaladekes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 3,064
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,107
    Quoting: ural740811
    What are you talking about?
    My friend, watch at least one Ceci game and at least once bother to look at Ceci's statistics to argue that this is a cap reset. You show absolute ignorance of the basic concepts of the game if you come to such absurd statements.


    Every single ACGM I’ve seen has the oilers moving Ceci for an upgrade, clearly there is a common theme that oilers are fine parting ways with ceci. If ceci was anything worse keeping he wouldn’t be included in these trades as a cap casualty.

    Lindholm returns a 1st+ Tanev returns a 1st

    You have offered a 20 yr old prospect that’s under .5ppg in the AHL and will be quite a bit down Calgary’s depth chart for young wingers. Akey is a decent young dman but at best projects to be a #4 dman but for a puck moving offensively minded dman you’d want to see a higher point production in the OHL which is high scoring Junior

    Ever since pitsburgh he’s always been overplayed and that’s shown with his team’s success playing him 20 minutes a night
    Quoting: ural740811
    What are you talking about?
    My friend, watch at least one Ceci game and at least once bother to look at Ceci's statistics to argue that this is a cap reset. You show absolute ignorance of the basic concepts of the game if you come to such absurd statements.


    2 1sts
    Broberg or Holloway
    Ceci for cap reasons
    Akey or Bourgeault
    Is the minimum for Lindholm and Tanev
    With Calgary retaining 4.675 mill.

    -You are ignoring factors like Calgary can probably get better returns selling each player separate.
    - Edmonton is a div rival and Calgarys biggest rival they will pry out the max value they can

    As for Ceci
    Never has had a WAR above 40%
    EV defence hovers around the 60th percentile
    EV offence around 20th percentile
    PK percentile has him well below average since joining Edmonton
    He’s a turnover machine.
    His GF/GA differential has barely been even or negative for most his career
    His Corsi is below 46%

    It has always been stated that teams have always overplayed him and he’s not a 20 minute a night defenceman.


    Yes he may block shots and yes he may hit but those stats have to been taken with a grain of salt at time. Rasmus Ristolainen Blocked lots of shots and hit a ton, usually was top of the league in both those categories but he was a defensive liability.

    Cody Ceci has his Highs but his Lows are much more detrimental, he’s inconsistent and that’s the bottom line
    30 janv. à 6 h 8
    #4
    ural740811
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 669
    Mentions "j'aime": 61
    Quoting: Dekes
    Every single ACGM I’ve seen has the oilers moving Ceci for an upgrade, clearly there is a common theme that oilers are fine parting ways with ceci. If ceci was anything worse keeping he wouldn’t be included in these trades as a cap casualty.

    Lindholm returns a 1st+ Tanev returns a 1st

    You have offered a 20 yr old prospect that’s under .5ppg in the AHL and will be quite a bit down Calgary’s depth chart for young wingers. Akey is a decent young dman but at best projects to be a #4 dman but for a puck moving offensively minded dman you’d want to see a higher point production in the OHL which is high scoring Junior

    Ever since pitsburgh he’s always been overplayed and that’s shown with his team’s success playing him 20 minutes a night

    2 1sts
    Broberg or Holloway
    Ceci for cap reasons
    Akey or Bourgeault
    Is the minimum for Lindholm and Tanev
    With Calgary retaining 4.675 mill.

    -You are ignoring factors like Calgary can probably get better returns selling each player separate.
    - Edmonton is a div rival and Calgarys biggest rival they will pry out the max value they can

    As for Ceci
    Never has had a WAR above 40%
    EV defence hovers around the 60th percentile
    EV offence around 20th percentile
    PK percentile has him well below average since joining Edmonton
    He’s a turnover machine.
    His GF/GA differential has barely been even or negative for most his career
    His Corsi is below 46%

    It has always been stated that teams have always overplayed him and he’s not a 20 minute a night defenceman.


    Yes he may block shots and yes he may hit but those stats have to been taken with a grain of salt at time. Rasmus Ristolainen Blocked lots of shots and hit a ton, usually was top of the league in both those categories but he was a defensive liability.

    Cody Ceci has his Highs but his Lows are much more detrimental, he’s inconsistent and that’s the bottom line


    Look, I get it, you like to exaggerate the things you talk about. Well, okay, that's your right.
    To the point. Ceci is a cap dump, no it is not, it is not a lie based on actual facts. I'm basing this on personal impressions of actual Edmonton games, match results, and statistical numbers. Therefore, there is no need to judge the defender by how some fans of this site manage him; this is not the ultimate truth.
    I don’t argue, Tanev is an improvement on Ceci, that’s why I made this exchange. But the truth is that this is not a huge improvement in the position, but a small improvement in the parameters that Ceci is already in good condition. For example, I think Tanev is a better skater, tougher, this is his advantage over Ceci. Over the past five seasons, Ceci has a positive +/- score, playing more than 20 minutes per game in Edmonton's first pairing against the opponent's best forwards. Listen, I don’t go deep into statistics, I give numbers of classical statistics, and they are good for him, but this is for an outside observer. And I first of all judge by the real game, Ceci is a reliable defender, he does high-quality defensive work, he has no mistakes in defense and is sent off very little, an excellent defender, definitely not a scorer, but he can support the attack, good passes and a good shot.
    So my offer is Ceci + Akey is a package for Tanev, since Ceci is a legitimate player of the 2nd pair of any NHL team, who plays for a reasonable price for one more season, and at the next deadline Calgary will receive for him with half of his salary withheld 2- oh draft pick. Akey is a high-scoring blueliner who moves the puck well, with the potential to be an NHL 2nd defenseman in three years. In the last rookie camp, he was the best defender, despite being the youngest. This is a worthy offer.
    For Lindholm, I offered the 1st round of the draft + Bourgault, who was selected in the 1st round of the 21 year draft, yes, I agree he is not very productive in the AHL, but he definitely has the potential to be a mid-six forward in the NHL in two years.
    And the fifth round of the draft for withholding half of the salary is an accepted price, look at the last deadline.
    Voir tout