SalarySwishSalarySwish

Taking a peek

Créé par: mvp13
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 janv. 2024
Publié: 16 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Don't take this too seriously. I'm just browsing and wanted to see what they can and can't afford. Especially don't take terms seriously, I didn't put much thought into them. But I do think these cap hits are pretty fair for the players I signed.

Looks like they can afford to upgrade some positions, and maybe even re-sign Bert if they choose to. Not sure how comfortable they will still be with Brodie, or if Gio will return. I think Benoit/Lagesson have looked good and can be viable 3rd pairing guys. Robo Jr seems to be doing well, maybe he can get an increased role next year.

Martin Jones gets a 1 year prove it deal. With the way goaltending is nowadays, I don't think I'd really go after anyone.

I think whatever happens is impossible to predict, because it's all dependent on what they do in the playoffs. At least the major contracts are out of the way. I don't think trading Marner or anyone else is necessary at all now that I see this on paper. They can remain fairly status quo.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
44 000 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $85 140 500 $0 $0 $2 359 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
845 833 $845 833 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

16 janv. à 9 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
I guess the biggest issues I see ias that you are way too reliant on all the forwards developing and being ready for BIG roles on a contender AND that defense will be even worse: Benoit becomes a top 6 for a contender, timmins suddenly discovers how to play defense, old man brodie keeps it together another year, and Liljegren a top 4 guy who doesn’t produce offensively enough, so its Reilly and a bunch of over the hill/underachievers/never-weres? And you’re marching out Jones like hes found the fountain of youth.

Ultimately, it seems like the Leafs and a lot of Leaf fans place no importance on defense or goaltending, and insist on this score at any/all means approach. This is just an exercise to see how they can maintAIN THE BIG 4, even though its apparent year after year that the structure doesn;t work/translate to the playoffs.

I know its all a what if/could we, but you have kind of ignored the main reason this team loses: defense
16 janv. à 9 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,916
Mentions "j'aime": 725
Quoting: Hammerwise
I guess the biggest issues I see ias that you are way too reliant on all the forwards developing and being ready for BIG roles on a contender AND that defense will be even worse: Benoit becomes a top 6 for a contender, timmins suddenly discovers how to play defense, old man brodie keeps it together another year, and Liljegren a top 4 guy who doesn’t produce offensively enough, so its Reilly and a bunch of over the hill/underachievers/never-weres? And you’re marching out Jones like hes found the fountain of youth.

Ultimately, it seems like the Leafs and a lot of Leaf fans place no importance on defense or goaltending, and insist on this score at any/all means approach. This is just an exercise to see how they can maintAIN THE BIG 4, even though its apparent year after year that the structure doesn;t work/translate to the playoffs.

I know its all a what if/could we, but you have kind of ignored the main reason this team loses: defense


That's a lot of words to let us all know you don't know how to read descriptions. Thanks
Voir tout