SalarySwishSalarySwish

Lets take a gander

Créé par: thekiller93
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 nov. 2023
Publié: 6 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Anywhere
    2.
    TOR
    1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
    2. Zadorov, Nikita
    Détails additionnels:
    I’m curious to think who says no?
    CGY
    1. Abruzzese, Nick
    2. Klingberg, John
    3. Minten, Fraser
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2026
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $80 031 450 $0 $0 $3 468 550 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    -1 125 000 $-1 125 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    6 nov. 2023 à 4 h 48
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 6,487
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,295
    Do you think Abrueze has much value?

    Do you think Klingberg is a cap dump? To Cakgary he is.

    Minten and a 1st is enough to get Tanev with retention, (Minten is a nice upper mid level prospect, but certainly no impact or blue chip, especially in most prospect systems)

    But youve p[aid nothing for dumping Klingberg, and lets be honest if youre moving an expiring 4miol UFA you just signed, you are dumping him. ANd youre paying nothing for Zadorov
    thekiller93 a aimé ceci.
    6 nov. 2023 à 4 h 54
    #2
    All heart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 301
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    Do you think Abrueze has much value?

    Do you think Klingberg is a cap dump? To Cakgary he is.

    Minten and a 1st is enough to get Tanev with retention, (Minten is a nice upper mid level prospect, but certainly no impact or blue chip, especially in most prospect systems)

    But youve p[aid nothing for dumping Klingberg, and lets be honest if youre moving an expiring 4miol UFA you just signed, you are dumping him. ANd youre paying nothing for Zadorov

    I understand some of these points but I don’t really think of klingberg as a cap dump more of having to send salary back to make it plus I definitely think flames can flip klingberg I doubt klingberg careers just over after ten games and he didn’t even play horrible for all 10 I think this is more me overrated prospects I guess
    6 nov. 2023 à 4 h 57
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 6,487
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,295
    Quoting: thekiller93
    I understand some of these points but I don’t really think of klingberg as a cap dump more of having to send salary back to make it plus I definitely think flames can flip klingberg I doubt klingberg careers just over after ten games and he didn’t even play horrible for all 10 I think this is more me overrated prospects I guess


    But to CGY, Klingberg has no value, even negative value, so while theres enough there for Tanev, theres nothing in that offwer for taking klingberg or them including zadorov.

    They are only trading them because they are UFAs, taking back a UFA as flawed as Klingberg (which is why you are dumping him) is counter productive.

    So the reason for acquiring klingberg was offense from blueline, but what you needed was a defender, thats a Leaf mistake and he offers nothing to CGY but another UFA they need to move at deadline (probably with retention). Theyll get far better offers
    thekiller93 a aimé ceci.
    6 nov. 2023 à 5 h 1
    #4
    All heart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 301
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    But to CGY, Klingberg has no value, even negative value, so while theres enough there for Tanev, theres nothing in that offwer for taking klingberg or them including zadorov.

    They are only trading them because they are UFAs, taking back a UFA as flawed as Klingberg (which is why you are dumping him) is counter productive.

    So the reason for acquiring klingberg was offense from blueline, but what you needed was a defender, thats a Leaf mistake and he offers nothing to CGY but another UFA they need to move at deadline (probably with retention). Theyll get far better offers


    For me this is more if the flames are 100 percent done then I don’t think it matters for them to take klingberg for the rest of the year because he does nothing for them if anything but if say that leafs Offer is the best they can get but they need take back klingberg to make trade work I think they do it
    6 nov. 2023 à 5 h 3
    #5
    All heart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 301
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    But to CGY, Klingberg has no value, even negative value, so while theres enough there for Tanev, theres nothing in that offwer for taking klingberg or them including zadorov.

    They are only trading them because they are UFAs, taking back a UFA as flawed as Klingberg (which is why you are dumping him) is counter productive.

    So the reason for acquiring klingberg was offense from blueline, but what you needed was a defender, thats a Leaf mistake and he offers nothing to CGY but another UFA they need to move at deadline (probably with retention). Theyll get far better offers


    But I do agree they probably get better offers im probably just overvaluing minten
    Voir tout