SalarySwishSalarySwish

weird swap but wanted opinions

Créé par: JMB423
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 2 nov. 2023
Publié: 2 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
i don't think this would be final value but this is the basis of the trade. Don't take it seriously, it's just for a fun discussion

Why this thought? cause i'm bored and wanted to try something different

Why Chi does this - Jones has 7 years left on a monster contract, and years 5-7 are probably going to be tight with this contract with some good rookies needing a pay day. At that point it'd probably be a negative value contract and tough to move without retention. They take on some bad contracts coming back (with term) but all shorter term to either flip in the coming year/two or use for some veteran leadership. Kane provides the grit they'll lose at the TDL selling Foligno and Perry, and still offers some positive value on a line with Bedard.
Campbell has reportedly had some mental struggles, so i think a low expectation environment might help that, and could even turn in to a positive asset eventually. Ceci short term replacement for Jones.

Why EDM does this. Getting rid of 3 bad contracts and getting a top 2 RD in return. He's overpaid 1-2mil/yr so it diminishes value a bit, but i think would do great for EDM. With those 3 contracts gone there's more than enough cap this year to get a cheap F replacement, and a backup goalie for cheap. This contract will match Nurses contract length as well

i added Perry and Vladar trades just for reference as they're regarded as 2 players avail at the TDL
Transactions
1.
2.
EDM
  1. Vladar, Daniel (1 100 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $79 880 000 $850 000 $5 050 000 $3 620 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-1 225 000 $-1 225 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

2 nov. 2023 à 12 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
CHI absolutely declines.
YeahRighttt, exo2769, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 nov. 2023 à 12 h 54
#2
LIVIN ON A PRAYER
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,496
Mentions "j'aime": 6,467
I think you may have unintentionally explained why Chicago wouldn't do this:

Quoting: JMB423
Why EDM does this. Getting rid of 3 bad contracts and getting a top 2 RD in return.


Jones looked really bad out of the gate with that new contract in hand, but has regressed more to what should be expected of a player of his calibre. I wouldn't say he's creating $9.5M in value for the Blackhawks, but relative to say Nurse, he's doing a better job at justifying his contract. I don't think there's a realistic scenario where Chicago takes on any of those contracts for free, nor do they part with their best defencemen for nothing.
exo2769, Hawksguy81, Snowhawk18 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 nov. 2023 à 13 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,333
Mentions "j'aime": 2,127
At 31, 29 & 32 years old, those players are not the return Hawks are looking for. When Hawks move those 2 they will be looking for picks & prospects coming back.
exo2769, Hawksguy81, Snowhawk18 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 nov. 2023 à 13 h 2
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 10,622
What about a Campbell Krug swap? I'm sure there would have to be more to it since the cap doesn't exactly align, but both are pretty terrible for their current teams. Maybe a change of scenery would do them both some good?
Garak a aimé ceci.
2 nov. 2023 à 13 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,400
Mentions "j'aime": 1,801
Quoting: JMB423
Why Chi does this - Jones has 7 years left on a monster contract, and years 5-7 are probably going to be tight with this contract with some good rookies needing a pay day. At that point it'd probably be a negative value contract and tough to move without retention.


1. The cap is going up.
2. Jones is the Hawks best D currently.
3. Jones contract is not limiting the team currently.
4. If it becomes a problem the Hawks will deal with it when the years and cap hit are more manageable.

It makes zero sense for the Hawks to do this now.
Hawksguy81, Snowhawk18, Garak and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
Voir tout