SalarySwishSalarySwish

VAN would you rather

Créé par: Hockey_Soul
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2023
Publié: 26 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Garland, Conor (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Connor Garland $2m retained
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $75 164 166 $0 $7 750 000 $8 335 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 oct. 2023 à 15 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 680
Mentions "j'aime": 204
If I had to choose one, the second one. Both are off on value, but the first one is further off. Colombus is paying the Canucks in the first one for that trade, not the other way around.
26 oct. 2023 à 15 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 613
Mentions "j'aime": 200
Benning might have done something like this, but giving up the best player, a decent pick AND retaining salary is pretty much a teenage boy fantasy more than anything else.
kingkanuck a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2023 à 15 h 55
#3
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,930
Mentions "j'aime": 1,061
Quoting: Boldirev
Benning might have done something like this, but giving up the best player, a decent pick AND retaining salary is pretty much a teenage boy fantasy more than anything else.


Quoting: SGB88
If I had to choose one, the second one. Both are off on value, but the first one is further off. Colombus is paying the Canucks in the first one for that trade, not the other way around.


VAN wants and needs to add a defenseman, and is going to have to move money out to do so. Garland is the better player, but I don't think it is a massive disparity. There is quite a bit of precedent across the league with the cap situation teams' are in for them to have to pay to move a contract with as much money and term as Garland's. Even with the retention it is taking 200-350k off of VAN's books for the next three years, and CBJ are adding that to theirs.

The value is slightly in CBJ's favor here, but no one is giving you a defenseman and taking Garland back without retention and pick.
26 oct. 2023 à 16 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 613
Mentions "j'aime": 200
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
VAN wants and needs to add a defenseman, and is going to have to move money out to do so. Garland is the better player, but I don't think it is a massive disparity. There is quite a bit of precedent across the league with the cap situation teams' are in for them to have to pay to move a contract with as much money and term as Garland's. Even with the retention it is taking 200-350k off of VAN's books for the next three years, and CBJ are adding that to theirs.


Vancouver wants cap space, but they're not gonna get hosed to do it, especially not for 200-300 k over three years. They know they need to retain, that's the payment relative to his value. They aren't gonna retain, pay a sweetener and take on a bad contract of a marginal player. Like I said jizz in your pants.....
26 oct. 2023 à 16 h 7
#5
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,930
Mentions "j'aime": 1,061
Quoting: Boldirev
Vancouver wants cap space, but they're not gonna get hosed to do it, especially not for 200-300 k over three years. They know they need to retain, that's the payment relative to his value. They aren't gonna retain, pay a sweetener and take on a bad contract of a marginal player. Like I said jizz in your pants.....


It sounds like you're probably underestimating these defensemen. They have flaws, but Peeke's numbers looks so bad due to how he was overutilized, and NHL GMs value physical dmen. Boqvist is an offensive dynamo with a rare skillset and is still young and developing. His defense sucks, but he still has a really high ceiling. 350k x 3 years is 1.05m, which based on established trades in this league, that is worth about a 4th round pick.

Maybe the retention has to be a little less, and/or maybe the pick has to be a round lower, but I do not believe this is that far off.
Voir tout