SalarySwishSalarySwish

Getting younger

Créé par: Jded
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 31 août 2017
Publié: 31 août 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
So yeah, Perry probably wouldn't waive his NMC for ARI, but humor me. I feel like the return for Arizona is there though, giving them top line talent at RW since they're far more loaded with promising youth at C and LW.

Karlsson fills the 3C void until Sam Steel is ready

Cogs leaves to clear room for youth, and I hate seeing players stay up until they're FAs and leave for nothing.

Landeskog seems prime as a "buy low" candidate right now. I paid what I think is a little more than he's worth (especially after that god-awful season) for the salary retention in return.

I feel like this would be one of the deepest teams in the league, still loaded with high-end talent in the top 6.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Crouse, Lawson
Détails additionnels:
Duclair
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Cogliano, Andrew
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
EDM has plenty of skill, but could use a hard working, penalty killer like Cogs.
3.
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (ANA)
4.
ANA
  1. Landeskog, Gabriel (1 571 429 $ retained)
COL
  1. Jones, Max
  2. Kerdiles, Nicolas
  3. Pettersson, Marcus
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2575 000 000 $59 568 417 $0 $2 187 500 $15 431 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
670 000 $670 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance700 000 $$700K)
DG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

31 août 2017 à 12 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 280
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Edmonton has no interest in cogs. He was part of the the very first oilers attempt at rebuilding the team which obviously didn't work out. Plus his 3 mill isn't that enticing for a third line player.
31 août 2017 à 12 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 302
Mentions "j'aime": 27
I don't get the trades honestly (outside of Edmonton):

Why would Arizona give up a ton of control of Duclair (who had 40+ points 2 years ago) and Crouse (who is just 20), for Perry's big contract. Perry is still a good player, but he's coming off a down year with just 53 points and only 19 goals in 82 games last year. At $8.6M a year for 4 years that is a lot of risk Arizona is assuming. Arizona paid less for Stepan and he's younger, and $2.1M a year cheaper. While Perry might slightly out-produce him over the next 4 years it will be close. Also, Arizona got 1 year of Raanta in the deal who may take over their starting goaltending duties this year.

Vegas- Karlsson has 3 years of cheap control, it's likely going to take more than a 2nd and 4th to get him. Maybe not a ton more, but I think maybe a pair of 2nds would be the asking price.

Colorado- Why would Colorado sell low on Landeskog? He's young, under control for 4 more years at a price they can easily afford given their cap space. There is no reason for them to trade him when his value is at the lowest. Maybe they do consider trading him at the deadline or next off-season, but that would only be if he's value is back to the promising young wing who can put up 55-65 points (if not more).
31 août 2017 à 16 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,840
Mentions "j'aime": 1,865
Quoting: skysniper_11
Edmonton has no interest in cogs. He was part of the the very first oilers attempt at rebuilding the team which obviously didn't work out. Plus his 3 mill isn't that enticing for a third line player.


Cogs actually plays on the Ducks' 2nd line. And yes he costs 3m, but EDM isn't cap strapped at all this season, and he has 1 year left on his contract so that isn't at all a problem for EDM. He brings great work ethic and high caliber penalty killing. Those would both help EDM
31 août 2017 à 16 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,840
Mentions "j'aime": 1,865
Quoting: steveospeak
I don't get the trades honestly (outside of Edmonton):

Why would Arizona give up a ton of control of Duclair (who had 40+ points 2 years ago) and Crouse (who is just 20), for Perry's big contract. Perry is still a good player, but he's coming off a down year with just 53 points and only 19 goals in 82 games last year. At $8.6M a year for 4 years that is a lot of risk Arizona is assuming. Arizona paid less for Stepan and he's younger, and $2.1M a year cheaper. While Perry might slightly out-produce him over the next 4 years it will be close. Also, Arizona got 1 year of Raanta in the deal who may take over their starting goaltending duties this year.

Vegas- Karlsson has 3 years of cheap control, it's likely going to take more than a 2nd and 4th to get him. Maybe not a ton more, but I think maybe a pair of 2nds would be the asking price.

Colorado- Why would Colorado sell low on Landeskog? He's young, under control for 4 more years at a price they can easily afford given their cap space. There is no reason for them to trade him when his value is at the lowest. Maybe they do consider trading him at the deadline or next off-season, but that would only be if he's value is back to the promising young wing who can put up 55-65 points (if not more).


Potentially because then Duclair had like 20 points last season. They're on the verge of being very exciting to watch and Perry will help with that. They also have a surplus of players who play the position that Crouse does, and are weak at RW, so Perry addresses that with a veteran presence. I don't disagree there's a high likelihood they'd say no to the trade though, just an idea. Karlsson isn't worth 2 2nds, if that was the ask no team would take it, but for a 2nd and a 4th I think that'd be tempting at least
31 août 2017 à 16 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Anaheim could also use Cogs...
Voir tout