SalarySwishSalarySwish

Canadian 1OA AF

Créé par: CannaHawk
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2023
Publié: 9 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Bedard, Connor
3925 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Lafrenière, Alexis5 000 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024
Choix de 3e ronde en 2024
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $71 284 290 $0 $3 162 500 $12 215 710 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Bedard, Connor
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
918 333 $918 333 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

9 juill. 2023 à 14 h 9
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,128
Mentions "j'aime": 10,612
I wouldn't offer sheet Laf, but I am curious what Drury is actually willing to accept. I'd give up quite a bit.
9 juill. 2023 à 14 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: exo2769
I wouldn't offer sheet Laf, but I am curious what Drury is actually willing to accept. I'd give up quite a bit.


What would you give up?
9 juill. 2023 à 14 h 55
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,128
Mentions "j'aime": 10,612
Modifié 9 juill. 2023 à 15 h 6
Quoting: Garak
What would you give up?


I guess it all depends on who you think he is as a player. I still think he's a really good player. I don't hold it against him that Drury's messing up his development.

2024 TBL 1st, Colton Dach, Taylor Raddysh come to mind. It's adjustable for sure. Obviously, a 1st is required. TRad can enter into the fold immediately and provide a great contract. Colton Dach is Bowman's draft pick...I could see him being shipped out. I would consider adding another minor piece if needed too.
Garak a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2023 à 19 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: exo2769
I guess it all depends on who you think he is as a player. I still think he's a really good player. I don't hold it against him that Drury's messing up his development.

2024 TBL 1st, Colton Dach, Taylor Raddysh come to mind. It's adjustable for sure. Obviously, a 1st is required. TRad can enter into the fold immediately and provide a great contract. Colton Dach is Bowman's draft pick...I could see him being shipped out. I would consider adding another minor piece if needed too.


Interesting. I probably wouldn't do that, but it is certainly interesting. Personally, I think I'd rather see what Dach and that 1st become than trade them for Laf. However, I do feel like Raddysh was always going to be a trade chip, and was never really in CHI's future plans. I know Dach was a Bowman pick, but so were Vlasic, Kaiser, and Reichel, among others. I'm not sure how involved Davidson was with Bowman's decision making process, but I'm sure he was in some capacity. So, technically, Bowman guys are still Davidson guys, too. We'll see though.

Regardless, CHI isn't anywhere close to being a serious contender and there will always be more targets down the road that we don't even know about right now. Guys that could provide the same amount of production and could have a lower trade value because their current team doesn't have a 1st overall pick invested in them. I don't look at Laf and think "I must have this player." So, why go spending NOW?
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2023 à 20 h 43
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,128
Mentions "j'aime": 10,612
Quoting: Garak
Interesting. I probably wouldn't do that, but it is certainly interesting. Personally, I think I'd rather see what Dach and that 1st become than trade them for Laf. However, I do feel like Raddysh was always going to be a trade chip, and was never really in CHI's future plans. I know Dach was a Bowman pick, but so were Vlasic, Kaiser, and Reichel, among others. I'm not sure how involved Davidson was with Bowman's decision making process, but I'm sure he was in some capacity. So, technically, Bowman guys are still Davidson guys, too. We'll see though.

Regardless, CHI isn't anywhere close to being a serious contender and there will always be more targets down the road that we don't even know about right now. Guys that could provide the same amount of production and could have a lower trade value because their current team doesn't have a 1st overall pick invested in them. I don't look at Laf and think "I must have this player." So, why go spending NOW?


All great stuff to consider. I'd be willing to do it for a few reasons. A.) Most importantly, I think his game translates to a playoff power forward game. He's just 21, scores most of his goals infront of the net. 100+ hits the last two seasons despite limited ice time...not that hits are all that great, just highlighting his willingness to be physical. B.) He hasn't had the chance for real PP time thats hes capable of. His stats in my mind are deflated vs mostt guys on Capfriendly trying to pump Victor Olofsson type guys. C.) IF you're trading for him...you better keep him a while. So he's part of your long term players. IF we trade for him now... lock him up to a "reasonable" 8 year. I don't think its nearly as big a risk as others. We know his floor. He can easily be a #3LW. We know the NYR are trying to low ball him right now. Give him some extra money now while we have tons of it...take some in year 6-8, when we'll likely need the cap. And since he's just 21...he's going to get to be a UFA at some point anyway. It's not like we'd be locking him up until he's 34.
Garak a aimé ceci.
Voir tout