SalarySwishSalarySwish

opening night roster

Créé par: DragonRaptorHybrid
Équipe: 2017-18 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2017
Publié: 31 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
mine's totally better than everyone else's
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de CGY
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2019
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de CGY
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2020
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $51 376 634 $2 498 441 $5 445 000 $23 623 366 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance662 500 $$662K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
839 167 $839 167 $ (Bonis de performance245 000 $$245K)
C
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
1 891 250 $1 891 250 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 083 333 $2 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
5 475 000 $5 475 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

31 juill. 2017 à 21 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Would it not make sense to start Keller at 2C instead of 2LW, and then move Dvorak to the wing?

Also, why Clendening over Schenn?
31 juill. 2017 à 21 h 56
#2
Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 324
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Good lineup. I have to say Arizona is looking like a team on the rise, Keller and Strome are elite prospects and Dvorak is no slouch either. The Hjalmarsson deal was huge, really solidifies your top pair.
Maybe Coyotes should scout around for another RHD, there's a lot of LHD on the team.
31 juill. 2017 à 22 h 20
#3
Sensible Commentary
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: tadhockey
Would it not make sense to start Keller at 2C instead of 2LW, and then move Dvorak to the wing?

Also, why Clendening over Schenn?
Keller diiiiiid play C at BU, but he's also tiny by hockey standards, and many coaches see smaller players as wingers instead of centers because of whatever size bias exists at that position.

As for Clendening vs. Schenn, here are their respective pages for this past season on HockeyViz: Clendening Schenn And here are their HERO charts, side by side.

The "Replacements" charts on HockeyViz indicate that Schenn wasn't much better than the rest of the Coyotes defense, but Clendening was miles better than the rest of the Rangers' defense. The "5v5 Shots Taken/Allowed (with/without)" charts indicate that Schenn wasn't much better at generating shots and slightly worse at allowing shots than the rest of the Coyotes. However, Clendening's charts indicate that he helped the Rangers generate more high-danger shots in the home-plate area and did a pretty good job of suppressing shots in his own zone compared to the rest of the Rangers' defense.

In short, Clendening's better than Schenn at generating shots for and suppressing shots against, but he never gets any leash from his coaches because he's deemed to be too risky due to his style of play. Pair him with a competent defender like Goligoski and allow him to play his game, and he should look miles better than others think he is. (Frankly, though, you could also pair him with Chychrun, and I wouldn't complain a lot. Chychrun's good, too.)
31 juill. 2017 à 22 h 23
#4
Sensible Commentary
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: Billius
Good lineup. I have to say Arizona is looking like a team on the rise, Keller and Strome are elite prospects and Dvorak is no slouch either. The Hjalmarsson deal was huge, really solidifies your top pair.
Maybe Coyotes should scout around for another RHD, there's a lot of LHD on the team.
Thanks.
Goligoski supposedly can play the right side, so that'll do, in a pinch.
Voir tout