SalarySwishSalarySwish

Best Non 1st Rd Draft Pick Roster

Créé par: Jded
Équipe: 2017-18 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2017
Publié: 21 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Comment on who you think I missed, and who they could replace!
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $123 820 605 $0 $0 $-48 820 605 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Benn, Jamie
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Pavelski, Joe
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Kucherov, Nikita
4 766 667 $4 766 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Gaudreau, Johnny
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Bergeron, Patrice
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Simmonds, Wayne
3 975 000 $3 975 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Panarin, Artemi
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Zetterberg, Henrik
6 083 333 $6 083 333 $
C
UFA - 4
Atkinson, Cam
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Marchand, Brad
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
O'Reilly, Ryan
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Neal, James
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Giordano, Mark
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 5
Holtby, Braden
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Josi, Roman
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Letang, Kris
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Quick, Jonathan
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Keith, Duncan
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Subban, P.K.
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Murray, Matt
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Byfuglien, Dustin
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Weber, Shea
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 9

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 juill. 2017 à 12 h 24
#1
Price_is_the_goat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 6,090
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
You put James neal instead of Gallaghar
21 juill. 2017 à 15 h 26
#2
Jded
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,819
Mentions "j'aime": 1,851
Quoting: Price_is_the_goat
You put James neal instead of Gallaghar


I'm sorry but I think you're biased for Gallagher because he plays for MTL. He scored 10 goals and less than 30 points this season. He's probably surpassed 20 goals like once in his career, and never more than 50 points. He is young, and could pick it up, but so far he's definitely no Neal.
Neal has been a 40 goal scorer, and I don't believe he's had a single season under 20 goals. He's also way bigger and can throw weight around instead of being a target and injury prone. I've gotta stick with Neal on this one.
21 juill. 2017 à 17 h 56
#3
Price_is_the_goat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 6,090
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Jded
Quoting: Price_is_the_goat
You put James neal instead of Gallaghar


I'm sorry but I think you're biased for Gallagher because he plays for MTL. He scored 10 goals and less than 30 points this season. He's probably surpassed 20 goals like once in his career, and never more than 50 points. He is young, and could pick it up, but so far he's definitely no Neal.
Neal has been a 40 goal scorer, and I don't believe he's had a single season under 20 goals. He's also way bigger and can throw weight around instead of being a target and injury prone. I've gotta stick with Neal on this one.


I agree with the points statement, but the reason for Gallaghar and not neal is 2 things. First is age, as Gallaghar is younger, and 2nd is Gallaghars play. He plays like a pest, annoys the hell outta opposing goalies, and best of all, he is a possesion beast. He drives the play. That would be my only reason for choose him over Neal. Neal is a great player, but he is steadily declining. Both players are heading in the opposite direction
21 juill. 2017 à 18 h 44
#4
Jded
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,819
Mentions "j'aime": 1,851
Quoting: Price_is_the_goat
Quoting: Jded


I'm sorry but I think you're biased for Gallagher because he plays for MTL. He scored 10 goals and less than 30 points this season. He's probably surpassed 20 goals like once in his career, and never more than 50 points. He is young, and could pick it up, but so far he's definitely no Neal.
Neal has been a 40 goal scorer, and I don't believe he's had a single season under 20 goals. He's also way bigger and can throw weight around instead of being a target and injury prone. I've gotta stick with Neal on this one.


I agree with the points statement, but the reason for Gallaghar and not neal is 2 things. First is age, as Gallaghar is younger, and 2nd is Gallaghars play. He plays like a pest, annoys the hell outta opposing goalies, and best of all, he is a possesion beast. He drives the play. That would be my only reason for choose him over Neal. Neal is a great player, but he is steadily declining. Both players are heading in the opposite direction


Fair point of view. Only issue is that I feel like Gallagher has gotten worse the last 2 seasons. That could change, but he definitely hasn't appeared to be trending in the right direction.

There's something said for being a pest. As a Ducks fan with Kesler and Perry on the roster i definitely recognize the value in it. The only difference is they both put up a lot of points as well. A pest without scoring is a goon, and the days of the goon in the NHL are behind us
21 juill. 2017 à 19 h 43
#5
Price_is_the_goat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 6,090
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Jded
Quoting: Price_is_the_goat


I agree with the points statement, but the reason for Gallaghar and not neal is 2 things. First is age, as Gallaghar is younger, and 2nd is Gallaghars play. He plays like a pest, annoys the hell outta opposing goalies, and best of all, he is a possesion beast. He drives the play. That would be my only reason for choose him over Neal. Neal is a great player, but he is steadily declining. Both players are heading in the opposite direction


Fair point of view. Only issue is that I feel like Gallagher has gotten worse the last 2 seasons. That could change, but he definitely hasn't appeared to be trending in the right direction.

There's something said for being a pest. As a Ducks fan with Kesler and Perry on the roster i definitely recognize the value in it. The only difference is they both put up a lot of points as well. A pest without scoring is a goon, and the days of the goon in the NHL are behind us


Well he has been injured a lot recently. As for his pesty ways, the mental game is really important in the nhl. If u have gally on the ice, goalies and opposing players focus on him, that creates space and opportunity, when the other team is focused on one player
Voir tout