SalarySwishSalarySwish

Nash

Créé par: Caletti12
Équipe: 2017-18 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 18 juill. 2017
Publié: 19 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
All depends on whether Nash would waive his no-trade to come to Calgary, but the Rangers could use the cap space and the Flames have the pieces to get a deal done. It would mean paying a team like Vegas to take Brouwer but I'm sure a deal could be worked out. I've always thought that trading Brouwer and retaining salary is a much better option than buying him out. A buyout will cost us 1.5M over the next 6 years, while retaining salary will only cost us for the next 3 years. At an AAV 3-3.5M, Brouwer becomes a lot more palatable to a team like Vegas who is going to be losing anyways and could use the veteran leadership.

Nash has only one year left so it wouldn't totally mess up CGY's cap situation, and if they re-sign him, it would be for a lot less than his 7.8M cap hit he's currently playing on.

I have him slotted on the 2nd Line with Bennett and Versteeg, as I think Ferland has earned a shot at the top line and Nash could possibly get Bennett going in a big way.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
3950 000 $
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Nash, Rick (3 000 000 $ retained)
NYR
  1. Kylington, Oliver
  2. Shinkaruk, Hunter
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
2.
CGY
    Future Considerations
    VGK
    1. Brouwer, Troy (1 000 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (CGY)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2018
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de DET
    2019
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CAR
    2020
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2375 000 000 $66 784 210 $660 000 $1 487 500 $8 215 790 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 5
    6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 6
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD
    UFA - 2
    3 575 000 $3 575 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    650 000 $650 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    612 500 $612 500 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    612 500 $612 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    19 juill. 2017 à 9 h 52
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 523
    Mentions "j'aime": 99
    Both mid-level prospects, the d man being the more interesting/upsided of the two. However, the Rangers are pretty good on D now for the foreseeable future. The winger is underwhelming. I don't think it would be enough, especially if your asking the Rangers to retain money.

    Nash would also have to waive, not sure he does that to go to Calgary (he's a Toronto native).

    The Rangers are good on cap space (3-4m under when Zibanijad is addressed), and would see even more relief when Nash's contract expires. As you said, he would be resigned for much less if he returns. Also not sure the Rangers are interested in moving him, if they were it probably would have happened a while ago. Which means they would have to be compelled by the offer. That could change of course by the deadline.

    Change the small winger into something more interesting, and change the 4th to a 2nd...or change both picks into one 1st.
    19 juill. 2017 à 19 h 4
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 2,232
    Mentions "j'aime": 401
    I think a lot more players will look at CGY as a decent destination after some of the moves Treliving has made around the defensive group, plus the progress of the top 9.

    Nash would be great at that cap hit, but to me that deal has to have some conditional protection on the draft pick(s) in order to make sense for CGY. Otherwise Nash has the option to walk after the season and CGY paid a huge rental price.
    Voir tout