SalarySwishSalarySwish

Fill in the Blanks

Créé par: chefed
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2023
Publié: 16 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Abruzzese, Nick
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Kerfoot, Alexander
  4. Steeves, Alex
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $79 223 746 $212 500 $0 $3 276 254 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
450 000 $450 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
840 630 $840 630 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

16 févr. 2023 à 14 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,376
Mentions "j'aime": 5,037
Terrible deal for CHI. Really not even close
Garak, OldNYIfan, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2023 à 14 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 399
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Why?
16 févr. 2023 à 14 h 59
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,121
Mentions "j'aime": 6,260
The chicago trade is like if someone went grocery shopping and when it was time to pay the cashier they put their hand in their coat pocket and gave whatever was inside to the cashier as payment. Sure, there might be some loose change in there ,but also some lint, spare wrappers you need to find a garbage for, and a whole lot of wasted time for both parties.

Chicago rejects.
Garak, OldNYIfan et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2023 à 15 h 57
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,636
Mentions "j'aime": 26,361
Quoting: chefed
Why?


Well, to begin with, you've got three actual NHLers (one of whom is a UFA) for two (both of whom are UFAs) and two prospects, so right there you have an imbalance. (Let's put aside for the moment the issue of whether the draft picks make up for that.) Moreover, UFAs are essentially worthless to teams like Chicago that won't be playing in May. In contrast, the UFA the Maple Leafs are getting is HIGHLY likely to be valuable to Toronto during the playoffs, especially inasmuch as he's having a better year than Kerfoot on a much, much worse team, so he can be expected to contribute even more than Kerfoot has. So that's a clearcut loss for Chicago that the third and the future second only partially redress.

Then you've got a fourth-line NHLer vs. the value of two prospects, neither of whom are all that exciting. So if we ended the analysis (and the trade proposal) there, Chicago would probably be worse off.

The BIG problem with this idea is that you've massively understated the trade value of a guy who's going to be your #2 LhD for THREE playoff campaigns, at an almost ridiculously low cap hit. McCabe's value by himself is probably a first-round draft pick, if not more -- look at the offers being bandied about on CapFriendly (and some among the pundits) for Vlad Gavrikov, who is a UFA. But let's say that I'm overestimating McCabe's worth. Then at the very least we have:
McCabe = future 2nd plus one of the prospects (and I'm being generous)
Domi >> Kerfoot, Holl and the third
Lafferty > the other prospect
In short, Chicago is getting robbed.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2023 à 18 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 399
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, to begin with, you've got three actual NHLers (one of whom is a UFA) for two (both of whom are UFAs) and two prospects, so right there you have an imbalance. (Let's put aside for the moment the issue of whether the draft picks make up for that.) Moreover, UFAs are essentially worthless to teams like Chicago that won't be playing in May. In contrast, the UFA the Maple Leafs are getting is HIGHLY likely to be valuable to Toronto during the playoffs, especially inasmuch as he's having a better year than Kerfoot on a much, much worse team, so he can be expected to contribute even more than Kerfoot has. So that's a clearcut loss for Chicago that the third and the future second only partially redress.

Then you've got a fourth-line NHLer vs. the value of two prospects, neither of whom are all that exciting. So if we ended the analysis (and the trade proposal) there, Chicago would probably be worse off.

The BIG problem with this idea is that you've massively understated the trade value of a guy who's going to be your #2 LhD for THREE playoff campaigns, at an almost ridiculously low cap hit. McCabe's value by himself is probably a first-round draft pick, if not more -- look at the offers being bandied about on CapFriendly (and some among the pundits) for Vlad Gavrikov, who is a UFA. But let's say that I'm overestimating McCabe's worth. Then at the very least we have:
McCabe = future 2nd plus one of the prospects (and I'm being generous)
Domi >> Kerfoot, Holl and the third
Lafferty > t















Oh Boy

The Hockey geniuses are back.

Now let's do a proper analysis of the trade.

First the value of the CBH players no retention. If Kane and Toews are flipped, they will need retention slots.

Domi 2nd or 3rd round pick UFA can resign with CBH.
McCabe 2nd round pick 2 years on contract.
Laferty 3rd or 4th round pick 1 year on contract.

What the Leaf s are sending

2nd round pick 2024
3rd round pick Ottawa's so a high 3rd.

Holl RHD flipped for 3 or 4th round pick.
Kerfoot same

Prospect NICK A top NCAA player played for Chicago Sting 1-year AHL .75 PTS per game.
Prospect Alex Steves top NCAA player Notre Dame 1-year AHL .75 PTS per game

Both are NHL ready.


So, at the end of the day CBH get 2 NHL ready prospects and 4 draft picks plus they could resign Domi.

How are they getting robbed this is an over payment by the Leafs but is a good trade for both teams for different reasons.

Looks like the same guys that complain about every TML trade for no reason.
Voir tout