Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,593
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Senko is a better add than Kane imo. We need someone to score goals not set them up. Plus it’s cheaper to acquire him than Kane. So no thank you, no deal we’d made given what you’d want in return. And swapping Kakko for Kane is stupid as we’d still need a RW. That would just be pointless. And when we inevitably can’t resign him, we have no Kakko since he’s gone in your hypothetical deal above. I think another team is better for a deal like this than the Rangers. Good luck.