SalarySwishSalarySwish

Toronto speculation

Créé par: mytduxfan
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 19 mai 2017
Publié: 19 mai 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
With recent reports of Babcock and Lou scouting the ANA-NSH series and the Ducks looking to trade a D-man for ED protection-exempt assets or a non-exempt forward, I propose the following as a fair trade that benefits both side.

Reasoning:

ANA: It gives ANA two expansion exempt pieces and injects youth into our aging line-up, all whilst reducing salary, which was higher this year than in previous years.

TOR: It gives TOR a solid top 3 D-man who will have an immediate impact on a team that is stacked up front.

Protection lists:

ANA:

F: Getzlaf, Perry, Kesler, Rakell, Silfverberg, Cogliano, Wagner.
D: Lindholm, Fowler, Manson.
G: Gibson.

TOR:

F: Kadri, JVR, Bozak, Komarov.
D: Reilly, Gardiner, Vatanen, Carrick.
G: Andersen.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2173 000 000 $59 894 250 $0 $850 000 $13 105 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
670 000 $670 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 2
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

19 mai 2017 à 10 h 30
#1
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
As fair as your deal is, and I am not saying it's not (it actually might be too fair), as a Leafs fan, I feel like they only have eyes for 1 of your D and that is Josh Manson. Even if it meant including a contract like Bieksa's in this deal, which would help ANA cap situation, I think the Leafs only deal with ANA if it included Manson.
19 mai 2017 à 10 h 31
#2
Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
The Leafs were scouting the Nashville/Anaheim game. Vatanen is a player the Ducks would move for that price, no doubt.
19 mai 2017 à 10 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
TOR fans, it may seem a steep price, but please note:

1. Kapanen is only a prospect with some good AHL numbers. There is still quite a bit of risk involved in trading a proven talent away for a non-proven talent.
2. D-men are more expensive and RD are even more expensive.

Maybe the 1st is too much, but this draft is weaker than most and BM will be looking to recoup the 1st we've lost in the Eaves trade. If you don't want Vatanen or don't see a fit, than there is no deal.

ANA fans - I have no idea what will happen with Despres. If he gets healthy, we have the cap space for him. Also, I said LV would take Shaw over Vermette because of his age, but I could be wrong.
OldRedFox a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2017 à 10 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Decent idea but for a team that has had a horrifying history of trading their first round pick over a year in advance (Luongo, Seguin, Hamilton, Niedermayer were all picked with first round picks the Leafs traded a year in advance) I don't think Toronto would use that pick.
19 mai 2017 à 10 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: MG1986
As fair as your deal is, and I am not saying it's not (it actually might be too fair), as a Leafs fan, I feel like they only have eyes for 1 of your D and that is Josh Manson. Even if it meant including a contract like Bieksa's in this deal, which would help ANA cap situation, I think the Leafs only deal with ANA if it included Manson.


I get that. Personally, I think Manson is over-hyped because of Corsi. He's ok alongside the right partner, but he is definitely a complimentary #4. Vatanen is the better player, but they obviously have different skillsets. Regardless, I don't see Manson moving. He's too cheap and we have Montour to step in and replace Vatanen next season. Meanwhile, we have no one who can replace the hitting, grit, and fighting ability that Manson brings.

Quoting: TomG
The Leafs were scouting the Nashville/Anaheim game. Vatanen is a player the Ducks would move for that price, no doubt.


I think the price is reasonable. If Kapanen didn't have such great AHL numbers, I'd ask for more. Those numbers reduce his risk, but he's still a prospect. Personally, I'd like a more proven forward i.e. Miller, Kreider, Palat, etc., but I think this deal makes more sense based on what I understand about the Ducks financial situation and the teams desire to remain competitive year-on-year.
Voir tout