SalarySwishSalarySwish

not just rentals

Créé par: shmoeman
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2022
Publié: 11 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Tried to base Hagel deal off of Coleman's a couple years ago being that the two are in very similar situations. Not sure how keen Chicago is in trading Hagel so it could certainly take more, but I think at the very least it's a good starting package

Chychrun deal gives ARI a top prospect, another 1st rounder (I think theyd prefer next years rather than this years given they already have 3 this year) as well as Debrusk who's playing great hockey. Qualifying offer is not a big deal given that ARI will look to get to cap floor next year (and if he keeps up the way he's playing, I don't see why a team wont offer him $4+ mill). Also important to not look over Vaak, played excellent hockey this year before getting injured. He looked at home playing 20+ minutes with McAvoy

From the Bruins side, they get two players at excellent cap hits for another 2/3 years respectively. Both are still relatively young and allows you more flexibility with your roster. Perfect for their window.

Will do Y2 as well
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Studnicka, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
(lowest of all 2nd rounders)
ARI
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 628 174 $1 956 507 $207 500 $-128 174 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

11 mars 2022 à 13 h 10
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,833
The difference between Hagel and Colemen is somewhat significant though. Coleman was 5 years old and only had 1.5 years on his deal. Hagel has an extra year and then RFA status. Coleman's career high in points in 36 and Hagel currently has 35 before the TDL in his 2nd season in the NHL. Hagel's ceiling is much higher.

I think you're correct to use comps as the basis of your trade, it's just not a 1 for 1 comp imo. That's all.
ChiHawk et CFMan a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2022 à 13 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,399
Comparing Hagel to Coleman is about as relative as it gets, but that said, it's still not all that relative. Hagel is 23, on a cheaper cap hit for 2 more seasons and then a RFA. Compared to Coleman, those are significant differences and add value obviously. Then add to it Hagel is more productive on the ice and nobody knows what his ceiling is only playing a year and a half in the NHL versus a 26 year old Coleman who was close to his ceiling. On top of it, the Hawks aren't shopping or wanting to trade Hagel, he fits their rebuild plans given his age, cap hit and RFA status.

If a trade for Hagel happens and I believe it to be highly unlikely, I think the Hawks hands have got to be forced with a stupid overpay which no fan of the acquiring team will like. 1st plus a younger top prospect is what analysts are saying.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2022 à 13 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,399
Quoting: ChiHawk
Comparing Hagel to Coleman is about as relative as it gets, but that said, it's still not all that relative. Hagel is 23, on a cheaper cap hit for 2 more seasons and then a RFA. Compared to Coleman, those are significant differences and add value obviously. On top of it, the Hawks aren't shopping or wanting to trade Hagel, he fits their rebuild plans given his age, cap hit and RFA status.

If a trade for Hagel happens and I believe it to be highly unlikely, I think the Hawks hands have got to be forced with a stupid overpay which no fan of the acquiring team will like. 1st plus a younger top prospect is what analysts are saying.
11 mars 2022 à 13 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,399
Quoting: exo2769
The difference between Hagel and Colemen is somewhat significant though. Coleman was 5 years old and only had 1.5 years on his deal. Hagel has an extra year and then RFA status. Coleman's career high in points in 36 and Hagel currently has 35 before the TDL in his 2nd season in the NHL. Hagel's ceiling is much higher.

I think you're correct to use comps as the basis of your trade, it's just not a 1 for 1 comp imo. That's all.


You beat me to it! LMAO
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2022 à 13 h 13
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,833
Quoting: ChiHawk
Comparing Hagel to Coleman is about as relative as it gets, but that said, it's still not all that relative. Hagel is 23, on a cheaper cap hit for 2 more seasons and then a RFA. Compared to Coleman, those are significant differences and add value obviously. Then add to it Hagel is more productive on the ice and nobody knows what his ceiling is only playing a year and a half in the NHL versus a 26 year old Coleman who was close to his ceiling. On top of it, the Hawks aren't shopping or wanting to trade Hagel, he fits their rebuild plans given his age, cap hit and RFA status.

If a trade for Hagel happens and I believe it to be highly unlikely, I think the Hawks hands have got to be forced with a stupid overpay which no fan of the acquiring team will like. 1st plus a younger top prospect is what analysts are saying.


A 1st and a top prospect is what analysts are saying...the Hawks have already said no to on (4) separate occasions. "top prospect" is relative as we don't really know what those offers were.
Voir tout