SalarySwishSalarySwish

New Marketing Ploy

Créé par: graderman
Équipe: 2017-18 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 26 avr. 2017
Publié: 26 avr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Is DeBrincat ready to bring his record setting Jr. game to the NHL? We shall see! Is Emelin healthy as a rugged defenseman who Quenneville will play? Again, we shall see. Would Crawford agree to a trade to an up and coming team in the EC? Once more, we shall see. Moving Anisimov to the 3rd line might not be a bad idea. Obviously, at his cap hit he should be top six. Yet, if he does not contribute to a puck possession game by winning face offs, causing the Kane line to be chasers, that is not a good thing.

On to this team's name. McCub is a marketing guy. He can now do his thing targeting a certain community by having the van RiemsDYK brothers at his disposal. And because Bowman bucked his recent trend of trading his first rounder, why not add Toronta's this draft to give the locals at the UC two middle 1st rounders?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Overages, Bonus
13 700 000 $
1650 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Bozak, Tyler (2 100 000 $ retained)
  2. Marchenko, Alexey
  3. van Riemsdyk, James
Détails additionnels:
2017 1st Round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Panarin, Artemi
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 500 000 $68 055 503 $3 558 000 $832 500 $7 444 497 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AD, C
UFA - 2
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Overages, Bonus
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 982 375 $2 982 375 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
G
UFA - 1
872 500 $872 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
 
 
 
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 avr. 2017 à 4 h 58
#1
This axis no meaning
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,616
Mentions "j'aime": 2,018
This is a joke right? The Toronto trade doesn't look terrible on paper but the other two trades look dreadful. Emelin's cap hit is the same as Hammer's, and Ward is such a downgrade that Carolina certainly would add something good in addition.
26 avr. 2017 à 5 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Quoting: Snobalt
This is a joke right? The Toronto trade doesn't look terrible on paper but the other two trades look dreadful. Emelin's cap hit is the same as Hammer's, and Ward is such a downgrade that Carolina certainly would add something good in addition.
Appreciate the quick reply. My thinking is lowering the goalie position's cap hit more than anything. To trade Crawford, salary will be coming back for sure. Ideally, Darling is retained at a Ward-like hit but how does Crow and his $6M piece of the pie get moved? To Philly or CalGary? Vancouver? As far as swapping Hjalmarsson for the same hit in Emelin, Chicago needs to add some toughness in their zone, and Montreal desires another guy to play opposite of Weber. Thanks anyways, tho.
26 avr. 2017 à 5 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
I suppose if Crawford waived his NMC and Vegas drafted him, that would be an answer to not bringing salary back and give the Hawks $6M to re-sign Darling and Panik. That most likely would mean Anisimov and Kruger would remain with the team.
26 avr. 2017 à 9 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,148
Mentions "j'aime": 199
I'll take a hard pass on the Montreal and Carolina trade.
If you're trading Crow you're not taking back a goalie with 3+M in cap space. Darling would be the starter in any Crawford trade. It would be better to trade Crawford for an overpaid forward that can play in the middle six than to pick up a goalie the Hawks don't need.
Hammer is more valuable than Emelin. They play a similar game but Hammer is much better at it. This benefits the team in no way. I'll pass.
Voir tout