SalarySwishSalarySwish

Deadline cap space

Créé par: Byrr
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 janv. 2022
Publié: 2 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
From Earl Schwartz: 'If they trade Ritchie [today] and keep this group of 21 (swap Biega for Sandin), the Leafs have $1.7m in cap space.

If they could keep that roster until the trade deadline, Toronto would have over $5m to spend at the deadline.'
https://twitter.com/EarlSchwartz27/status/1477445833461219330
Transactions
TOR
    I don't care.
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $79 783 116 $0 $400 000 $1 716 884 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    2 janv. 2022 à 7 h 32
    #1
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,832
    Yea, I don't see Ritchie traded though. I really wonder what Dubas was thinking last summer when the cap tight Leafs signed him. But not only Dubas, the high priced Leaf executives who also have duties related to the cap and the structure of the the team. Gee, they could have gone on CapFriendly and decided, "Hey this isn't going to work with Ritchie."
    2 janv. 2022 à 7 h 40
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,040
    Quoting: palhal
    Yea, I don't see Ritchie traded though. I really wonder what Dubas was thinking last summer when the cap tight Leafs signed him. But not only Dubas, the high priced Leaf executives who also have duties related to the cap and the structure of the the team. Gee, they could have gone on CapFriendly and decided, "Hey this isn't going to work with Ritchie."


    I mean Ritchie hasn't played well but there wasn't much reason to think he wouldn't before the season. They signed a player who was on pace for 20ish goals and 40ish points the season before who comes with 'size' and 'grit', The Leafs took 4 low cost gambles on players, Ritchie, Kampf, Kase and Bunting. Ritchie stands out because he's the only one who didn't work. Bringing in an excess number of them was an insurance policy.
    2 janv. 2022 à 7 h 44
    #3
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,804
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,832
    Quoting: Byrr
    I mean Ritchie hasn't played well but there wasn't much reason to think he wouldn't before the season. The Leafs took 4 low cost gambles on players, Ritchie, Kampf, Kase and Bunting. Ritchie stands out because he's the only one who didn't work out. Bringing in an excess number of them was an insurance policy.


    It's just the 2.5m that seemed unworkable. Remember he was probably the last signing of the summer. Even if he was playing to a 2.5m level it's still a cap issue. But you're right about the other three, great 3.7m value.
    2 janv. 2022 à 7 h 45
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,040
    Quoting: palhal
    It's just the 2.5m that seemed unworkable. Remember he was probably the last signing of the summer. Even if he was playing to a 2.5m level it's still a cap issue. But you're right about the other three, great 3.7m value.


    2.5m isn't a cap issue. Any one of those players could be removed from the list and the cap would work.
    2 janv. 2022 à 7 h 51
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2021
    Messages: 884
    Mentions "j'aime": 535
    Quoting: Byrr
    2.5m isn't a cap issue. Any one of those players could be removed from the list and the cap would work.


    This is a quality assessment. Taking the low-budget risks that they had to has paid off really well and management should be praised for utilizing the small cap space they had to make this team.
    Voir tout