SalarySwishSalarySwish

What would the return be

Créé par: DontheGoat
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 26 nov. 2021
Publié: 26 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I saw an ACGM and i kind of liked it. I have been wondering the values of these players. Labanc would be a good player with hall and coyle or getzlaf and i can just feel them pumping out goals. Getzlaf is just a solid player that can play playoff hockey. And then the d
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
ANA
    Lindholm could be the #1 left handed d the bruins have been looking for or mason could free up reilly who when playing with clifton has had to worry about defense too much. Reilly can play better than he has if he is more free to play his game.
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2023
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2024
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2581 500 000 $89 988 452 $1 956 507 $1 625 000 $-8 488 452 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    26 nov. 2021 à 16 h 13
    #1
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    They should but I don't see Anaheim selling rn

    It'd probably have to be over pays

    Labanc would be a good buy low ish addition
    FunMustBeAlways et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    26 nov. 2021 à 16 h 17
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,793
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,838
    Lindholm will likely extend.

    Probably should pay more attention. Zboril has taken Clifton’s job and has arguably been the 2nd best defenseman since he has. Manson would be a good add tho.

    I think Ducks will be on the playoff bubble at the deadline. Not sure they will move Getzlaf because of it.

    Not much interest in Labanc, not an area of need. If they wanted to swap him for Debrusk…maybe, or Haula and late pick…sure. Don’t see SJ being interested in either of those ideas.
    26 nov. 2021 à 16 h 29
    #3
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 40,273
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,181
    I think that we'll try very hard to re-sign Lindholm, and as Boston stalwart @Gofnut999 says, I doubt we'll trade Getzlaf unless we're out of the playoff hunt. Manson, on the other hand, is probably worth a 2022 second plus a good prospect. Lysell is too much, of course, but is Studnicka?
    26 nov. 2021 à 16 h 37
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,139
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,627
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Lindholm will likely extend.

    Probably should pay more attention. Zboril has taken Clifton’s job and has arguably been the 2nd best defenseman since he has. Manson would be a good add tho.

    I think Ducks will be on the playoff bubble at the deadline. Not sure they will move Getzlaf because of it.

    Not much interest in Labanc, not an area of need. If they wanted to swap him for Debrusk…maybe, or Haula and late pick…sure. Don’t see SJ being interested in either of those ideas.


    You are correct, San Jose wouldn’t be interested in either of those trades.
    Gofnut999 et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    26 nov. 2021 à 17 h 22
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,196
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
    Quoting: glarson17
    You are correct, San Jose wouldn’t be interested in either of those trades.


    i think t meh sharks consider debrusk for Labanc.
    yes ye is another lw and we need rw but labanc needs a change of scenery and debrusk contract expires this offseason. we can use his cap space to pick up a short term RW until one or all of Robins Coe and Weisblatt are ready for top 9 min
    Voir tout