SalarySwishSalarySwish

Opening Night

Créé par: Claesson4Norris
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 14 oct. 2021
Publié: 14 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
DJ hinted that they might rock 11-7 to start the season. Probably the best option until they can find some stop gap solution so they aren't running a line of Kelly-Shaw-Sabourin regularly.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $59 186 750 $0 $4 507 500 $22 313 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
726 667 $726 667 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 oct. 2021 à 6 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
why did we bring in sanford only to scratch him in favour of kelly and shaw though lol. not really complaining as long as brannstrom gets to play though, but i'll also say i thought we brought in MDZ to be like a 4/5D, not an 8D (even though objectively he should be a 7/8D)
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 6 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,994
Mentions "j'aime": 11,997
Quoting: Alfie11
why did we bring in sanford only to scratch him in favour of kelly and shaw though lol. not really complaining as long as brannstrom gets to play though, but i'll also say i thought we brought in MDZ to be like a 4/5D, not an 8D (even though objectively he should be a 7/8D)


I mean... Sanford was a complete ghost in pre season. I think he's still adjusting to the new team and systems and he'll pick it up shortly, but right now sitting him if you're rolling 11-7 is probably the move. He had a way worse camp than Kelly, and Shaw looked competent and is a regular C which gives him the edge as well. DJ already confirmed Kelly was playing opening night, so if a forward comes out it's probably Ennis or Sanford, and that should be a really easy choice.

As far as MDZ goes, I didn't get the sense that he was DJ's guy at all. He was absolutely garbage, and if anything I think he just made DJ realize how good Mete really is (praised Mete multiple times as a guy who can break out and defend). He's such a bad fit for what this team needs, it honest to God makes me think the Sens might have had him confused with a different player when they signed him. If DJ is serious when he says the best players will play, there's absolutely no shot MDZ is in the opening lineup. He was the worst player on the ice for Ottawa at all times.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 8 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,492
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Thank God you don't have Sabourin in the lineup. Seeing him on the opening roster makes me want to burn things.

Seriously, the last 2 off-seasons have been infuriating

We have such amazing drafting/development but yet, we are not even trying to benefit from it lol. I mean, we could start competing for the playoffs while several of them would be on their ELCs. But we just don't have enough Zubs and Connor Browns (solid vets)

Quoting: Alfie11
why did we bring in sanford only to scratch him in favour of kelly and shaw though lol. not really complaining as long as brannstrom gets to play though, but i'll also say i thought we brought in MDZ to be like a 4/5D, not an 8D (even though objectively he should be a 7/8D)


Well, Del Zotto and Sanford are the 2 puzzling moves of the off-season this year. Not as outrageously puzzling a Stepan for a 2nd or Balcers on waivers, but still. I seriously have no idea why Dorion makes moves like this, can't find any other rational explanation. The only thing I found is maybe him and the pro scouting staff always get tricked by old tapes of these players from 2-3 years ago...
Voir tout