SalarySwishSalarySwish

Connor Mcdavid I guess

Créé par: Hertls_Turtle
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 12 sept. 2021
Publié: 12 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
SJ have no reason to do this, but i guess this is what it'd cost, ignore cap problems
Transactions
EDM
  1. Eklund, William
  2. Kniazev, Artemi
  3. Merkley, Ryan
  4. Weatherby, Jasper
  5. Wiesblatt, Ozzy
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
  8. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 002 030 $0 $425 000 $4 497 970 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

12 sept. 2021 à 4 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Oilers easily say no.

In any case, I feel like any trade with McDavid is almost always going to be a lose-lose. Edmonton would be losing the best player in the deal, and integrating the quantity they are going to get in return is going to be a mess. The team acquiring McDavid is going to have to gut their depth, and such a big shakeup is going to cause a lot of problems.
12 sept. 2021 à 4 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,593
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Quoting: DenisPotvin
Oilers easily say no.

In any case, I feel like any trade with McDavid is almost always going to be a lose-lose. Edmonton would be losing the best player in the deal, and integrating the quantity they are going to get in return is going to be a mess. The team acquiring McDavid is going to have to gut their depth, and such a big shakeup is going to cause a lot of problems.


While certainly giving up the best player, let’s not pretend the return isn’t decent, the offer isn’t insulting.
12 sept. 2021 à 17 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 188
Mentions "j'aime": 98
No thanks.
13 sept. 2021 à 8 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: DenisPotvin
Oilers easily say no.

In any case, I feel like any trade with McDavid is almost always going to be a lose-lose. Edmonton would be losing the best player in the deal, and integrating the quantity they are going to get in return is going to be a mess. The team acquiring McDavid is going to have to gut their depth, and such a big shakeup is going to cause a lot of problems.


I agree that this sort of deal would be lose-lose. Although a McDavid trade isn't going to happen in the next 4 years (if ever), there would have to be a marquee piece coming back plus prospects plus picks, rather than a collection of prospects & picks. Like this:

TB - Brayden Point ++
COL - Cale Makar ++
MIN - Kaprizov ++
TOR - Matthews ++

etc.

An 8-for-1 deal with no outstanding pieces doesn't get the Oilers to answer the phone.
15 sept. 2021 à 14 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Quoting: CD282
I agree that this sort of deal would be lose-lose. Although a McDavid trade isn't going to happen in the next 4 years (if ever), there would have to be a marquee piece coming back plus prospects plus picks, rather than a collection of prospects & picks. Like this:

TB - Brayden Point ++
COL - Cale Makar ++
MIN - Kaprizov ++
TOR - Matthews ++

etc.

An 8-for-1 deal with no outstanding pieces doesn't get the Oilers to answer the phone.


Sure, but it seems that McDavid would only be traded if Edmonton were rebuilding. In that case, why would you want to get a top player in his prime back? You'd want top picks and prospects.
Voir tout