SalarySwishSalarySwish

Worst general manager in the league

Créé par: CMcAvoy73
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 juill. 2021
Publié: 28 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Bruins needed a big splash on the left side of the D, one solid middle six option on the right side, and a cheap goalie to tide them over until rask was healthy.

Instead? A million bottom six options, a couple bottom pair D, and an overpaid goalie for 4 years. Puke.

Cling to every prospect you can don, all while making sure you block them with mediocre talent.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 750 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 635 674 $1 956 507 $0 $1 864 326 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
I just think if you wanna squeeze what’s left of Bergeron/Krejci (just read they were close to deal) you have to spend. If Studnicka comes to camp and lights it up, he will earn a spot. Ullmark actually put up pretty solid numbers while playing for by far the worst team in the league. If the B’s spend 5-6 million dollars in net the next few years that is way better than what most teams are spending back there. Defense is still a little iffy.
28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 40
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
I just think if you wanna squeeze what’s left of Bergeron/Krejci (just read they were close to deal) you have to spend. If Studnicka comes to camp and lights it up, he will have a spot. Ullmark actually put up pretty solid numbers while playing for by far the worst team in the league. If the B’s spend 5-6 million dollars in net the next few years that is way better than what most teams are spending back there


Then spend on something good maybe?

I also think todays bottom six spending spree means they might have decided to move on from krejci despite last nights reports. This team got destroyed today.
28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,511
Mentions "j'aime": 255
I expected this from the start. Ullmark I think could be actually solid. He had good numbers in a literal hell hole up in BUF. The forwards signed only one I truly dont mind is Nosek. I like Forbort, but definitely not a fan of Reilly. In an ideal perfect world I would've loved Forbort, Martinez (which I believe BOS offered the same deal to as VGK but he wanted to stay, just saw someone mention it, cant confirm if its true), and Coleman/Saad to improve the scoring depth. Could they have handled it cap wise? Im not sure but there was likely a way to clear the cap and make a big splash like you said.
28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 43
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: ngikas
I expected this from the start. Ullmark I think could be actually solid. He had good numbers in a literal hell hole up in BUF. The forwards signed only one I truly dont mind is Nosek. I like Forbort, but definitely not a fan of Reilly. In an ideal perfect world I would've loved Forbort, Martinez (which I believe BOS offered the same deal to as VGK but he wanted to stay, just saw someone mention it, cant confirm if its true), and Coleman/Saad to improve the scoring depth. Could they have handled it cap wise? Im not sure but there was likely a way to clear the cap and make a big splash like you said.


Clear cap space to make a splash? They just spent 8 million on bottom six guys and 6 million on what should be bottom pair d men…

Sweeney just depthed his way into a really poor team.

Ullmark…whatever. He’s a bit of a crap shoot. 4x5 for a goalie that’s played 100 okay games is a bit much for me. There’s a 95% chance that Rask at his worst is better than Ullmark at his best.

This is just a really bad day to be a bruins fan.
28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Then spend on something good maybe?

I also think todays bottom six spending spree means they might have decided to move on from krejci despite last nights reports. This team got destroyed today.


https://twitter.com/thefourthperiod/status/1420494223837745153?s=21

I just think most bruins fans complained about the bottom 6. They went out and got guys to fix that. Maybe they got one guy too many, but they’ve spent the last 2-3 years expecting the young guys to make the jump and they haven’t. It’s not like Studnicka/Freddy didn’t have a chance to play. They’ll have to come into camp and battle for a spot. You wanna complain about not getting a top 4 D, fine, I can see that. (Although I don’t think they’re quite done) out of curiosity… what would you have spent it on?
Voir tout