SalarySwishSalarySwish

Big Moves

Créé par: graderman
Équipe: 2016-17 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 déc. 2016
Publié: 2 déc. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I'll preface with this most likely will never happen. On paper and, perhaps in production, the Hawks are losing their best LWer and one of their most trusted defensemen. They, in turn, trade the acquired LW for a d tandem that was pretty solid late last season in Dallas. Lord knows the Chicago Blackhawks NEED a crease clearing guy like Johns as much as ever. (Never should have dealt him in the first place!). Oduya might be on his last NHL legs but is very familiar with the system and should be able to play top four minutes for the remainder of this season. I absolutely love Boyle. He is a beast! At a million less, he is a better option, IMO, than Kruger. Drouin is a wild card. He is nowhere the player Panarin already is but may be an easier sign than Breadman. Additionally, trade their own 1st to Arizona for Hanzal at the TDL.

While Chicago currently has the most points in the league without the recent benefit of their top leader, they are not dominating other teams, only winning. Do these moves make the team more dangerous to play against? Would they be better, tougher, harder opponents? Do these moves help out their cap situation without disrupting their goal of raising another Cup next spring? Who knows. Flame away, guys!
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de STL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2473 000 000 $61 749 087 $3 070 000 $4 252 500 $11 250 913 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
AD, C
UFA - 3
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
575 000 $575 000 $
C
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 300 000 $$2M)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
717 500 $717 500 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
587 500 $587 500 $
G
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $ (Bonis de performance437 500 $$438K)
DG
UFA - 1
872 500 $872 500 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
DG
UFA - 3
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 déc. 2016 à 14 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,148
Mentions "j'aime": 199
Hammer has the second best contract on the Hawks behind only Keith. I personally will almost never agree on a Hammer trade.
The Hawks top five (Keith, Hammer, Seabrook, Campbell, Kempny) is a very very strong defensive group. I don't think it needs any upgrading. Seabrook and Kempny are those "crease clearing guys" that you say the Hawks need.
Much of the Hawks seemingly defensive issues are due to poor defensive play/positioning, and breakout troubles of the forwards.

I think by now it's obvious we disagree on the value of Kruger. Would not having his 3+ mil contract help the Hawks cap problems? Yeah maybe. But Kruger>Boyle hands down.
Panarin>>>Drouin
Hawks get fleeced in that Tampa trade. And saying Drouin would be easy to sign is absurd. Did we forget this kid refused to play for months because he thought he was too good? That won't be an easy signing whatsoever.
Voir tout