SalarySwishSalarySwish

Lindholm & Stoner

Créé par: brian123
Équipe: 2016-17 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 oct. 2016
Publié: 13 oct. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
By also swapping Stoner for Hunwick, Anaheim gains more cap flexibility this year and next. Toronto signs Tanguay to a cheap deal to somewhat replace JVR for the year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Stoner, Clayton
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Lindholm
ANA
  1. Hunwick, Matt
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. van Riemsdyk, James
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Conditions come off of the 2nd rounder from the Anderson trade, Anaheim gets both the OTT and SJS pick.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2018
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $72 945 334 $512 000 $5 582 500 $54 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
686 667 $686 667 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
625 000 $625 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

13 oct. 2016 à 13 h 57
#1
leafs1967again
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Really bad for ANA. You don't trade a #1/2 D to create cap flexibility when the guy is so young lol. The return is very underwhelming and is pure quantity.
13 oct. 2016 à 15 h 23
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,911
Mentions "j'aime": 23,459
Don't know why a rebuilding team like the Leafs need to take on Lindholm (and his contract) and unneeded Stoner (and his salary) for four or five assets.
13 oct. 2016 à 15 h 32
#3
leafs1967again
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: palhal
Don't know why a rebuilding team like the Leafs need to take on Lindholm (and his contract) and unneeded Stoner (and his salary) for four or five assets.


Come on palhal. You can't honestly be made at this. Lindholm is approach star status - if he hasn't already reached it. You take them when you have the chance. $6M for him is well worth it. Leafs give up very little (in comparison) for a LOT. Bad GM's turn this down.
13 oct. 2016 à 15 h 41
#4
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: palhal
Don't know why a rebuilding team like the Leafs need to take on Lindholm (and his contract) and unneeded Stoner (and his salary) for four or five assets.


Because Lindholm is a 22 year old player not even close to his prime yet is still a borderline #1 already? Seriously????? I'll chalk it up that you're confusing Lindholm with someone else, because that deal is a no brainer for Toronto.
13 oct. 2016 à 16 h 14
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,911
Mentions "j'aime": 23,459
Hello leafs1967 and BreKel. Thank you for your comments and they might be closer to reality than what I wrote. But, I think we are approaching untold silliness when guys come of their RFAs and we think they all are deserving huge salaries. I know stats aren't everything but Linholm and Trouba are 30 point Dmen. Other RFA silliness Jones of Columbus, maybe McKinnon of the Avs. Gee, Kucherov signed for "just" 4.6m. Maybe Kucherov should be the norm.
I admit I don't watch Lindholm that much, but he is worth 7% of your cap? Zaitsev might be as good as any Leaf Dman, does he get 6m next year? I know it's long way away (3 years) but if Marner and Matthews, Nylander (2 years) want and deserve big raises, the Leafs will be in the same position as the Ducks.
Voir tout