SalarySwishSalarySwish

What I would do

Créé par: arafay
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 16 sept. 2020
Publié: 17 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Can’t be giving markstrom a gaudy contract imo when the expansion draft is next year and demko is looking like the goaltender of the future. Therefore, I traded for Raanta. Arizona could use a guy like shotgun jake in return. Also throw in baertschi to balance value and salary

I left plenty of space to get 3 depth forwards to fill out the roster
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 500 000 $
65 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
ANA
3.
VAN
    Waivers
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de ANA
    2021
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $77 031 878 $1 700 000 $4 550 000 $4 468 122 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    17 sept. 2020 à 19 h 45
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Galchenyuk won’t make 3M IMO
    arafay a aimé ceci.
    17 sept. 2020 à 20 h 17
    #2
    Best In The World
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 3,272
    Mentions "j'aime": 658
    VAN is not trading for a injury prone goalie.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    17 sept. 2020 à 20 h 49
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 1,576
    Mentions "j'aime": 732
    I think some of the VAN fans are expecting a lot from their young D prospects. I see a lot of people posting some combination of Rathbone, Juolevi, and Rafferty as their bottom pairing, personally I find this concerning. They are decent prospects however they have a combined 3 NHL games experience, of which one of those games was 8 minutes of play time, that’s asking a lot. I think they should carry 8 D this year and have two of them play in the #7 & 8 spots, get them adjusted, let them develop for a season , or at least until the trade deadline then make a decision on them. Having them on the bottom pairing playing together and banking they will be ok (lots of people say they may not be ready quite yet) seems like a big risk to take, especially if your making Demko your number 1.
    17 sept. 2020 à 20 h 54
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 7,317
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,384
    Quoting: Reason
    I think some of the VAN fans are expecting a lot from their young D prospects. I see a lot of people posting some combination of Rathbone, Juolevi, and Rafferty as their bottom pairing, personally I find this concerning. They are decent prospects however they have a combined 3 NHL games experience, of which one of those games was 8 minutes of play time, that’s asking a lot. I think they should carry 8 D this year and have two of them play in the #7 & 8 spots, get them adjusted, let them develop for a season , or at least until the trade deadline then make a decision on them. Having them on the bottom pairing playing together and banking they will be ok (lots of people say they may not be ready quite yet) seems like a big risk to take, especially if your making Demko your number 1.


    Not a really a big canucks fans so I don’t know much about all that. Imo they are both ready. As I said, I left 3M to pick and choose whatever depth they want, whether it’s 2f/1d or 1f/2d
    17 sept. 2020 à 21 h 4
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 1,576
    Mentions "j'aime": 732
    Quoting: arafay
    Not a really a big canucks fans so I don’t know much about all that. Imo they are both ready. As I said, I left 3M to pick and choose whatever depth they want, whether it’s 2f/1d or 1f/2d


    If you don’t know much about that, how can you say you think their ready? Kind of a contradiction, unless I miss understood.

    Oli, was in the AHL all year, showed some improvement and had a good showing in camp and the 8 minutes he played during the play in. No one thought he was playing the NHL next year until he made the extended roster for the playoffs and now half the fan base is saying he’s ready.

    Rathbone is the best prospect of the 3, likely will develop into a good offensive middle pair. However insiders are split on where he should play next season, some said NHL ready, some said they don’t even think he is currently ready for the AHL next season.

    Rafferty had a great AHL season, played decent in his two games of NHL action last year, he’s definitely the most ready in my opinion, but again if you want to be a playoff team that’s a risk to bank on. Your 3 mil for a depth signing can cover either the left or right side, so your still banking on if then panning our.
    Voir tout