SalarySwishSalarySwish

leafs d core

Créé par: vr1995
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 7 août 2020
Publié: 7 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Leafs D core is bad, really bad but where do you think it ranks amongst the league, bottom 5, bottom 10?
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $94 821 866 $0 $0 $-13 321 866 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

7 août 2020 à 9 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,220
Let's look at it this way. They have 2 defenceman. Detroit don't have players, San Jose only have forwards, Anaheim are all looking for retirement homes, Los Angeles are looking for roommates for their retirement homes. Ottawa are looking for league minimum players. It's not bottom 5


In all honesty, I'd put at the bottom of the play-in teams. Maybe above someone like the Rangers. But 23/24. It's BAD
7 août 2020 à 9 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,377
Mentions "j'aime": 5,038
Quoting: Caniac2000
Let's look at it this way. They have 2 defenceman. Detroit don't have players, San Jose only have forwards, Anaheim are all looking for retirement homes, Los Angeles are looking for roommates for their retirement homes. Ottawa are looking for league minimum players. It's not bottom 5


In all honesty, I'd put at the bottom of the play-in teams. Maybe above someone like the Rangers. But 23/24. It's BAD


Anahiem's D is better than this. Lindholm, Folwer, Manson. San Jose's is better than this too. San Jose's is overpaid and on contracts that go till they're 40, but Burns, Karlson, Classic is still way better than what the leafs have. I won't argue you on the rest, but at least LA has doughty and Ottawa has Chabot. Leafs is probably still better but at least those teams have their #1 and just have to fill in the rest around that.
7 août 2020 à 9 h 27
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,293
Mentions "j'aime": 11,054
Quoting: Caniac2000
Let's look at it this way. They have 2 defenceman. Detroit don't have players, San Jose only have forwards, Anaheim are all looking for retirement homes, Los Angeles are looking for roommates for their retirement homes. Ottawa are looking for league minimum players. It's not bottom 5


In all honesty, I'd put at the bottom of the play-in teams. Maybe above someone like the Rangers. But 23/24. It's BAD


Hey! Don't pick at the Ducks like that! Hampus Lindholm: 26 years old. Cam Fowler: 28 years old. Josh Manson: 28 years old. MDZ was the only defenceman that they had that was over 30 this year. *EDIT*: Matt Irwin played 9 games.

For comparison, the current Ducks roster listed has an average age of 27.6 (And that's with Irwin instead of Mahura or Guhle), and the Canes are at 27.3.

Not that I'm comparing the overall quality on the Ducks back end to the Canes, we're just bad enough on the right side without you coming around calling everyone a senior citizen! tears of joy
7 août 2020 à 9 h 29
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,293
Mentions "j'aime": 11,054
Quoting: Wadejos123
Anahiem's D is better than this. Lindholm, Folwer, Manson. San Jose's is better than this too. San Jose's is overpaid and on contracts that go till they're 40, but Burns, Karlson, Classic is still way better than what the leafs have. I won't argue you on the rest, but at least LA has doughty and Ottawa has Chabot. Leafs is probably still better but at least those teams have their #1 and just have to fill in the rest around that.


Anaheim has more parts, but I wouldn't say that they're "better" per se. The massive hole on the right side, plus the fact that Manson missed a big chunk of time really made them look bad this year. A full year of Manson, plus *hopefully* filling the other hole on the right side, would make them better though!

Spot on re: San Jose though, and Ottawa has the chance to look really, really good in a couple of years!
7 août 2020 à 9 h 29
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Wadejos123
Anahiem's D is better than this. Lindholm, Folwer, Manson. San Jose's is better than this too. San Jose's is overpaid and on contracts that go till they're 40, but Burns, Karlson, Classic is still way better than what the leafs have. I won't argue you on the rest, but at least LA has doughty and Ottawa has Chabot. Leafs is probably still better but at least those teams have their #1 and just have to fill in the rest around that.


i agree with the ducks being better for sure, but rielly is a 1 and is better than doughty
Voir tout