SalarySwishSalarySwish

Retool for 2021 Playoffs

Créé par: SJS2212
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 22 juill. 2020
Publié: 22 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Strengthen the right side of the forward group, add a veteran goalie to play with Jones, and don't give up the farm in the process.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
2850 000 $
1750 000 $
11 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (DET)
2.
SJS
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
TOR
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
3.
SJS
  1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Suomela, Antti [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 190 833 $0 $410 000 $8 309 167 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

22 juill. 2020 à 17 h 30
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Get TVR outta here, sign a cheaper RD(Rutta), sign Greiss instead of Elliott and add another depth forward like Wilson/Pitlick/Gagner/Nosek
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2020 à 19 h 41
#2
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,749
Mentions "j'aime": 3,231
That trade package does Columbus no good whatsoever. We do not need or want random depth Cs, and minor picks do not get our attention w/r/t an Anderson trade. Offer better, or offersheet him.
22 juill. 2020 à 20 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Get TVR outta here, sign a cheaper RD(Rutta), sign Greiss instead of Elliott and add another depth forward like Wilson/Pitlick/Gagner/Nosek


Sharks were high on TVR out of college. DW is notorious for circling back on guys he previously liked and finding a way to get them eventually (for better or worse).

Re: Greiss/Elliott, there was bad blood between Greiss and the McClellan staff/org during his first stint in SJ re: playing time. Not sure if that is water under the bridge or still a sore subject, but not counting on him to sign in SJ until I hear something linking him to the organization. Think under Boughner's more conservative system that we saw once he took over last season (keeping the rush outside and limiting chances versus Deboer's excuse of the run and gun) that Elliott can rebound playing in a more low event system compared to what he has been in since leaving STL. Jones also played much better under Boughner (.906 save percentage compared to .891 under Deboer) so there is some cautious optimism about getting league average goaltending out of that tandem next season.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 1 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: Drjohnson022
Sharks were high on TVR out of college. DW is notorious for circling back on guys he previously liked and finding a way to get them eventually (for better or worse).

Re: Greiss/Elliott, there was bad blood between Greiss and the McClellan staff/org during his first stint in SJ re: playing time. Not sure if that is water under the bridge or still a sore subject, but not counting on him to sign in SJ until I hear something linking him to the organization. Think under Boughner's more conservative system that we saw once he took over last season (keeping the rush outside and limiting chances versus Deboer's excuse of the run and gun) that Elliott can rebound playing in a more low event system compared to what he has been in since leaving STL. Jones also played much better under Boughner (.906 save percentage compared to .891 under Deboer) so there is some cautious optimism about getting league average goaltending out of that tandem next season.


Wise and thoughtful I agree but I want Stalock if he is available since he's cheaper but I like this roster. Though I think Anderson makes 3.35 to 3.5 and same with Labanc.
Anderson trade will take a 2nd and a 3rd plus One of our young talented LD kids.
23 juill. 2020 à 8 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Wise and thoughtful I agree but I want Stalock if he is available since he's cheaper but I like this roster. Though I think Anderson makes 3.35 to 3.5 and same with Labanc.
Anderson trade will take a 2nd and a 3rd plus One of our young talented LD kids.


I can't see either of them commanding that sort of salary on a flat cap given the seasons that each had last year. Think both guys take a 1 year deal and see what happens this coming season both in terms of potential recoup of revenues increasing the cap in the coming years. I agree that swapping pieces around for Anderson makes sense. Strictly went about it with the idea of Suomela being someone Jarmo would like/want given the Finnish connection there and the likelihood that he is going to be jettisoned from SJ this offseason because the org is married to Jumbo at 3C until he dies sadly.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
Voir tout