SalarySwishSalarySwish

Compiling moves for centers that make the most sense

Créé par: TanSor
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2020
Publié: 13 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Offer sheet compensation
2.
MIN
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Brodin, Jonas
Détails additionnels:
Brodin signs an extension.
3.
MIN
  1. Schmaltz, Nick
Détails additionnels:
This would depend completely on how confident Arizona is with Hayton and Dvorak. Probably the most unlikely of the three, but if they think Hayton is ready for a top 9 role then it's possible they move one of their centers and a talented defenseman like Dumba could be enticing.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1681 500 000 $55 191 091 $0 $0 $26 308 909 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

13 juin 2020 à 13 h 31
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Schmaltz definitely won't be available. He's more of a winger anyways, he's terrible when playing centre but he's one of those analytic darlings so Arizona won't be moving him.

Tampa is matching any offer sheet for Cirelli so that won't be done.

If you're offering Brodin with an extension you can get more than Strome and a pick. Strome's nowhere close to what he was supposed to be and doesn't have high value. You could add more in return there and he's the only viable option really outta these 3.
13 juin 2020 à 13 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Schmaltz definitely won't be available. He's more of a winger anyways, he's terrible when playing centre but he's one of those analytic darlings so Arizona won't be moving him.

Tampa is matching any offer sheet for Cirelli so that won't be done.

If you're offering Brodin with an extension you can get more than Strome and a pick. Strome's nowhere close to what he was supposed to be and doesn't have high value. You could add more in return there and he's the only viable option really outta these 3.


You sound so sure about Schmaltz, but like I said if they think Hayton is ready for a big role then I think moving a center makes sense.

How the hell can Tampa match an offer sheet when they have $5M in cap space with 15 players signed? Everyone says they can just move a big contract but all of the players that they should move have full NTC's. Saying they'll move one is way easier said than done. If the Wild offered $7M for 6 years there's no way Tampa can match that.

Yeah I think we could get more as well but Blackhawks fans vehemently disagree.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2020 à 13 h 39
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: TanSor
You sound so sure about Schmaltz, but like I said if they think Hayton is ready for a big role then I think moving a center makes sense.

How the hell can Tampa match an offer sheet when they have $5M in cap space with 15 players signed? Everyone says they can just move a big contract but all of the players that they should move have full NTC's. Saying they'll move one is way easier said than done. If the Wild offered $7M for 6 years there's no way Tampa can match that.

Yeah I think we could get more as well but Blackhawks fans vehemently disagree.


Like I said, Schmaltz is more of a winger. He's brutal in the faceoff circle and more effective when he can use his speed down the wings. They'll move him to permanent wing when Hayton and Dvorak are ready full time. Plus Schmaltz is on a good deal so they'll be keeping him. I am pretty sure about that.

Just because Tampa has little cap space now, doesn't mean that's how it'll be always. People on here seem to forget that. They'll prioritize who to keep and who to move. A good young 2way centre like Cirelli will likely be high on the keep list. Guys like Johnson, Gourde, Killorn, etc. can easily be moved for decent value to clear cap space by the time next year starts. & remember that teams are allowed to go 10% over the cap in the off-season so they can match any reasonable offersheet and then move cap around after. Only way a team gets him is to either overpay by an offersheet or make a trade with Tampa for him. They won't let him walk to an affordable offersheet
13 juin 2020 à 13 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Like I said, Schmaltz is more of a winger. He's brutal in the faceoff circle and more effective when he can use his speed down the wings. They'll move him to permanent wing when Hayton and Dvorak are ready full time. Plus Schmaltz is on a good deal so they'll be keeping him. I am pretty sure about that.

Just because Tampa has little cap space now, doesn't mean that's how it'll be always. People on here seem to forget that. They'll prioritize who to keep and who to move. A good young 2way centre like Cirelli will likely be high on the keep list. Guys like Johnson, Gourde, Killorn, etc. can easily be moved for decent value to clear cap space by the time next year starts. & remember that teams are allowed to go 10% over the cap in the off-season so they can match any reasonable offersheet and then move cap around after. Only way a team gets him is to either overpay by an offersheet or make a trade with Tampa for him. They won't let him walk to an affordable offersheet


You didn't read what I said, moving those guys with full NTC's will be a lot easier said than done. They have to waive their clause in order to be traded. The cap will most likely not go up, so why would any team want to add one of those big contracts without giving up any cap? So Tampa would have to find a team that the player would be willing to waive for and that same team would have to be willing to take on a pretty big contract. I'd imagine that's an extremely short list, if there's even a list at all. I agree that Tampa will absolutely prioritize keeping him, but if a team offers a $7M x 6 year contract that I'd happily sign him to, there's no way they can make that work.

As for Schmaltz, he's bad on the dot but I like him at center. He can make more plays there which is what the Wild need.
Fox_Czar_Cup et Trickster a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2020 à 13 h 44
#5
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,841
Mentions "j'aime": 5,810
Quoting: TanSor
You sound so sure about Schmaltz, but like I said if they think Hayton is ready for a big role then I think moving a center makes sense.

How the hell can Tampa match an offer sheet when they have $5M in cap space with 15 players signed? Everyone says they can just move a big contract but all of the players that they should move have full NTC's. Saying they'll move one is way easier said than done. If the Wild offered $7M for 6 years there's no way Tampa can match that.

Yeah I think we could get more as well but Blackhawks fans vehemently disagree.


The guy you are responding to is a leafs troll (and on my ignored list) I wouldn’t put to much stock into what he says.
TanSor, OldNYIfan et Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout