SalarySwishSalarySwish

Hawks next year and Draft

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 mai 2020
Publié: 9 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
No CBO and flat cap.... Tough spot to be in, but this is probably the most likely scenario.

Blackhawks Draft inclusive of trades made below.

#9 OA - Cole Perfetti - LW. I think he's going to drop a few spots because of his skating ability. His hockey IQ, vision, playmaking are top notch, but he's not the fastest player. The player is really hope they don't draft though is Holtz. I know I'm in the minority here, but I'd prefer Jack Quinn over Holtz. Quinn has a better shot IMO and utilizes it better. Holtz doesn't take a lot of high danger shots. I hope every prospect plays well, but it worries me is all that Holtz best attribute (his shot) to me isn't really the best in the league and he doesn't utilize it well.

Pick #53 - Alex Cotton - This is a bit of a risk IMO. Clearly he had a great year with Lethbridge, but He's a year older than his draft eligible peers and he gets PP time with Dylan Cozens and Calen Addison. Yes his 5v5 stats are pretty good too. I just don't see him being a pick in the 30's or 40's like other sites are suggesting because of the 1 good year he's had. It's nothing against him...I'm drafting him after all...it's just a really deep draft year and I think he'll fall a bit.

Pick #55 - Dmitri Ovchinnikov - Another high risk high reward pick IMO. His speed/vision/playmaking is there IMO, but it'll take him 3 years to be NHL ready. He's very small and doesn't look physically able to play in the AHL yet...let alone the NHL.

Pick #71 - Xavier Simoneau - Another really small guy. He'll need a number of years to simply mature into an adult before he can take any AHL players let alone NHL players. Very offensive minded. There is a role for these players, but I don't think his game is a 2-way game. Will need to be paired with other bigger 2-way forwards, but Kirby Dach and Strome are bigger guys...so why not? Use his offensive abilities.

Pick #78 - Logan Morrison - One of the youngest guys in the draft. He's literally 2 full years younger than Alex Cotton, but the same draft. No one should be expecting a 3rd round pick to be NHL ready any time soon. This will allow Logan multiple years in the OHL to continue to develop his game. He needs work defensively, but offensively he's already pretty darn good.

Pick #102 - Nico Daws - G - I prefer NOT to take any goalies in the 1st round. If another teams wants to risk that...fine. I do however believe in numbers for G prospects. Nico Daws was in Hawks prospect camp last year. He's been on their radar for a while.

Pick 164 - Callen Clang -YUP another goalie prospect. If a guy like Cayden Primeau can be draft #199 overall...then clearly goalie prospects can have at least some upside here. The Hawks need quantity right now.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Suter, Pius
1925 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Cost controlled speedy/gritty NHL player that's played on the top line with Toews and the 4th line. He can protect your 1st round investments.

Dylan Sikura is the Icehogs leading scorer. He's got NHL talent, but isn't getting a chance with the Hawks.

The 5th rounder is the feather to make it work IMO.
OTT
  1. Caggiula, Drake
  2. Sikura, Dylan
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $70 619 431 $1 090 244 $5 050 000 $10 880 569 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Suter, Pius
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

9 juin 2020 à 14 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,063
Mentions "j'aime": 215
Now why is Kane 2nd line????
9 juin 2020 à 14 h 46
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,594
Mentions "j'aime": 9,671
Quoting: Habs123
Now why is Kane 2nd line????


Because he's been there for just about his entire career. He and Toews don't often play with eachother. Only when the blendo matic gets used. They've been split apart of most of their careers. I suspect this will also help Dach develop as well.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
9 juin 2020 à 14 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,063
Mentions "j'aime": 215
Quoting: exo2769
Because he's been there for just about his entire career. He and Toews don't often play with eachother. Only when the blendo matic gets used. They've been split apart of most of their career.


Ok but Debrincat a good rookie is supposed to be 1st line not 3rd what the hell
9 juin 2020 à 14 h 52
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,594
Mentions "j'aime": 9,671
Quoting: Habs123
Ok but Debrincat a good rookie is supposed to be 1st line not 3rd what the hell


Maybe. I prefer to distribute the talent vs load them all on one line. It's more of a preference thing. Strome and Debrincat are better when together. If the Hawks can roll 3 lines that can score then they're harder to play against. If you put all your best players on one line then that line will go up against a shutdown line and be neutralized like the AK72 line...Panarin Anisimov Kane were in the playoffs.
ChiHawk et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
9 juin 2020 à 14 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,063
Mentions "j'aime": 215
Quoting: exo2769
Maybe. I prefer to distribute the talent vs load them all on one line. It's more of a preference thing. Strome and Debrincat are better when together. If the Hawks can roll 3 lines that can score then they're harder to play against. If you put all your best player
s on one line then that line will go up against a shutdown line and be neutralized like the AK72 line...Panarin Anisimov Kane were in the playoffs.


So then put Strome on the 2nd line and Debrincat as well cuz Dach is not 2nd liner
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout