SalarySwishSalarySwish

1 comp bo and flat cap

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2020
Publié: 30 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Is it going to suck seeing #7 in another sweater? For sure, but this is also one of the most obvious compliance buyouts in the NHL. It has to be done. $6.875M for 4 more years... Has to be done.

I think Strome's going to get a 1 year prove it deal. There's a lot going on in this situation. Strome was injured for a good part of last year AND was also asked to play wing a lot...for some dumba$$ reason. He can't help those and kudos for playing out of position, but his performance this year was NOT close to what it was last year. He's a true center and this wing experiment failed terribly... It was almost as bad as watching Kane play center in 2011. UGH that was painful! Strome's likely a #3C on this team. It is what it is, BUT the Hawks might be able to keep him with Debrincat. Having them together...even on the 3rd line...is a luxury. That's definitely some scoring depth which all teams need.

As for the top 6. That top line needs to play together for AT LEAST the 1st 15 games. They've played outstanding together. Heck, if they play well enough maybe we can convince Saad to stay in CHI, but this time for a reasonable contract.

The 2nd line. Dach's a playmaker and really is the center that Kane's been looking for his entire career. Would it be a better fit if Dach was 100% developed already...sure, but that's not what we have today. They need A LOT of ice time together because that is a lethal dynamic. Either one of them can bring the puck across the blue line and Dach's already proven he can play in front of the net. Kane needs a snipe across from him...which is easier said that done, but that's why I put Kurashev there. He probably has the highest talent level/vision out of all the forwards currently in Rockford.

Why did i NOT put Nylander there? I honestly just think that he plays better in a bottom six role. That's NOT AT ALL a knock on who he is. That doesn't mean he can't play there. It just means don't try to fix something that isn't broken. Don't over think it. If he plays better on a 3rd or 4th line...just keep here there. Results are Results.

As for that 4th line. it's a high energy line with a pretty solid faceoff guy. Nylander seems to be taking well to that role. Don't fight it.

Now for the hard part. The defense. It's a lot of guys for ice time. Beaudin will likely start out in Rockford which is fine. Let's see how DeHaan is with his injury situation. He may start out LTIR just for better conditioning for the full year. That gets us down to 7. Unfortunately maybe a Seeler or Koekkoek will get waived.

Now for the exciting part. The cap might not be going up, but that $6.875M means we can likely afford Lehner AND Crow again. Yes, it's optimistic, but they did it last year and by all accounts they were happy and we could all witness how well they each played when they tandem in net.

The biggest draw back to this approach. It's not going to make people happy when much of the roster stays the same. Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different results is kinda the definition of insanity. What I'm going to stay to those people... The Hawks played more rookies than ANY other team in the NHL. What isn't realistic...is expecting every other team's rookies to develop, but 100% of the Hawks rookies to NOT develop. I hope Boqvist is working out like a mad man right now...getting bigger and tougher. I hope Dach doing the same. He's still just 19 years old and 3rd youngest player in the entire NHL. Kubalik can bring a full year of comfort knowing that he's a true NHL talent...not trying to figure out who he is (although I place some blame there on Jeremy Colliton because most fans saw this out of the gate).

Who I would draft... I hope either Rossi or Perfetti are available. Then Lundell. What I'd like to see is another center, but a smaller/speedy scoring center. This can help create greater line differences. Thunder and Lightning.
The 2nd round pick, I'd probably go with best goalie available, but would 100% understand if there's someone else that jumps out at them.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
2800 000 $
13 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
66 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
    The assumed compliance buyout occurs and Seabs get it.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MTL
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2481 500 000 $71 208 597 $1 090 244 $4 282 500 $10 291 403 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    Aucun commentaire n'a encore été émis! Soyez le premier