SalarySwishSalarySwish

ANA-BOS

Créé par: mytduxfan
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2020
Publié: 8 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
BOS gets a 1st/2nd line goal scorer on a very cheap deal to bolster their line-up for a deep playoff run, the addition of Manson somewhat covering the loss of Carlo, + dumps a bad contract to free up space to re-sign Debrusk and Krug. This helps BOS solidify their line-up until 2022. ANA a gets younger and better RD to solidify their top pairing beyond the retool + young assets and picks.

BOS line-up after trade:

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
Rakell - Krejci - Debrusk
Heinen - Coyle - Bjork
Kuraly - Lindholm - Ritchie

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Manson
Moore - Grzelcyk

Rask - Halak
Transactions
ANA
  1. Backes, David
  2. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  3. Carlo, Brandon
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $61 623 118 $0 $2 182 500 $19 876 882 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

8 janv. 2020 à 21 h 11
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Just waiting for that one BOS fan saying something like "Beecher is off limits" or something to that effect.
8 janv. 2020 à 21 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Just waiting for that one BOS fan saying something like "Beecher is off limits" or something to that effect.


Fine. I am not tied to him, but we'd need a solid prospect coming back as a replacement to Rakell.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2020 à 21 h 41
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Ducks could do better than Carlo in a Rakell trade. Carlo is actually significantly worse than Manson in even strength Corsi this year and throughout his career. He’s younger than Manson but I don’t see the potential to be any better than him.

Idk enough about Beecher but looking at his numbers it looks like he struggled at the WJC and so far at Michigan.

Personally I just think there’s a better D to be had if Rakell is being moved.
8 janv. 2020 à 21 h 51
#4
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
So you want to trade a top 6 F and a top pairing D, both entering their prime in the next couple of seasons, for a top 4 D, a cap dump, a late 1st, and a B prospect? No chance Anaheim takes this.
9 janv. 2020 à 0 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Jah1722
Ducks could do better than Carlo in a Rakell trade. Carlo is actually significantly worse than Manson in even strength Corsi this year and throughout his career. He’s younger than Manson but I don’t see the potential to be any better than him.

Idk enough about Beecher but looking at his numbers it looks like he struggled at the WJC and so far at Michigan.

Personally I just think there’s a better D to be had if Rakell is being moved.


Fair. I think Manson has been poor this year and he wasn't that great last season. Maybe I am undervaluing him and overvaluing Carlo. I kind of view them as equivalent players, but believe that Carlo has more to bring given his age. It was just a thought. I have concerns about our back-end and don't really see a standout option via the draft. Moreover, I think we need a franchise forward or at least another potentially elite 1C option.

Thanks for the feedback though. Always appreciated!

Quoting: NickC1988
So you want to trade a top 6 F and a top pairing D, both entering their prime in the next couple of seasons, for a top 4 D, a cap dump, a late 1st, and a B prospect? No chance Anaheim takes this.


Well, Manson isn't a top pairing D. He's a top 4 that has good chemistry with Lindholm, who is a legit top pairing D-man. Manson is 28 years old, so he's already in his prime years, not just entering, and he's not exactly been that great recently. He's certainly not the Manson from a couple seasons ago. Rakell is a quality player and worth a tonne, especially given his sweetheart contract. Maybe the value is off because I am overvaluing Carlo. It's just hard to find good quality D-men and he ticks a lot of boxes i.e. young, big, good mobility, etc.
Voir tout