SalarySwishSalarySwish

Lines for Next Game

Créé par: kopiino
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 oct. 2019
Publié: 4 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Biggest takeaways from the Philly game:
- Our defense still is not good
- Keith is not a 1st pairing defenseman.
- Gilbert is not an NHL player.
-Maatta and Seabrook are both still very, very slow.
- Some positive signs in the forwards
- Kubalik and Kampf made a great pairing (Kampf just couldn't win the faceoffs)
- Nylander scored! Still wish we had Jokiharju instead.
- Alex DeBrincat is still our best player

Kubalik and Kampf led this game for me from an offensive standpoint. Kubalik finished with a 57.97 xGF% and a 55.56 FF% and Kampf had a 61.56 xGF% and a 56.25 FF%. The only downside was Kampf's faceoffs. He came into the season with a 49% career FO% but couldn't seem to catch a break until later on. I'd replace Saad with Shaw to take the faceoffs if Kampf doesn't have any luck next game.

Saad was also very good, so moving him up to either the Cat-Strome or Toews-Kane line should work well for him. Still drives play forward well and is still our best defensive top 6 forward by the looks of it.

Nylander scored, but didn't do much else. Give Perlini a shot to play with Toews-Kane to see if he can get a decent start to his year going.

Caggiula was our worst forward this game in my opinion.

Defense is still a ?. Keith shouldn't be our 1LD but we have nobody else, so he stays for now.

Start Crawford because I have him in fantasy.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $67 500 811 $0 $4 207 500 $13 999 189 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 oct. 2019 à 20 h 24
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
I think Bowman traded for de Haan and Maatta to help Keith
4 oct. 2019 à 20 h 44
#2
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Max27
I think Bowman traded for de Haan and Maatta to help Keith


I don't really see how either of them can help tbh. If Keith plays with Maatta then CDH plays with Gus and having two OFDs won't really work out there. Maatta is also too slow to make up for Keith's mistakes and Keith isn't skilled to make up for Maatta's mistakes. If Keith plays with CDH, Gus plays with Maatta (who will bring him down, and Gus doesn't play good enough defensively to make up for Maatta's mistakes), and CDH and Keith both really like moving forward, and will result in a lot of mistakes defensively.

This defense is a mess. Honestly just put whoever together and call it a day at this point
4 oct. 2019 à 20 h 48
#3
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: kopiino
I don't really see how either of them can help tbh. If Keith plays with Maatta then CDH plays with Gus and having two OFDs won't really work out there. Maatta is also too slow to make up for Keith's mistakes and Keith isn't skilled to make up for Maatta's mistakes. If Keith plays with CDH, Gus plays with Maatta (who will bring him down, and Gus doesn't play good enough defensively to make up for Maatta's mistakes), and CDH and Keith both really like moving forward, and will result in a lot of mistakes defensively.

This defense is a mess. Honestly just put whoever together and call it a day at this point


What I meant is that by getting those players, Keith isn't the only left D (Gustafsson is better at playing on the right side I believe) capable of playing big minutes.

So, instead of playing him 27-28 minutes per game, they can play him 24-25 minutes per game...

That's 2-3 minutes less per game... 2 X 80=160 minutes... that's 2 games and the majority of another that Keith doesn't have to play...

For instance, instead of playing him on the first PK unit with Murphy, they can play him on the second unit with Seabrook...
5 oct. 2019 à 0 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,219
Mentions "j'aime": 9,585
Strome is a step behind, his speed is brutal but once he's in the play he's good.

Kampf needs to play 4C or wing on a higher line. He's not good against tougher 2Cs or 3Cs from other teams on the faceoffs. Kubalik and Saad have great chemistry, Kampf isn't playing at their level.

Maatta and Seabs are slow but looked decent. Maatta plays good positioning for sure.

Besides the major turn over leading to the first goal by Gilbert, he looked good. He's hands down better then Koekko.

Keith is not a #1 anymore, he looked bad. While made some good plays made a lot of bad plays as well and definitely cost the team a goal if not 2.

Gus defensively looked bad but offensively looked extremely good.

Nylander was absent for 80% of the game but looked good for 20%.

Caggs has no business on the 1st line.

Shaw is Shaw...sometimes overskates but love his style.

Debrincat was manhandled on the boards but biggest effort on the team and skills to shoot.

Kane is hands down a top 5 player in the league...guy is a stud.

Toews was also solid.

Crow....wow...where did Crow go?
5 oct. 2019 à 0 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: ChiHawk
Strome is a step behind, his speed is brutal but once he's in the play he's good.

Kampf needs to play 4C or wing on a higher line. He's not good against tougher 2Cs or 3Cs from other teams on the faceoffs. Kubalik and Saad have great chemistry, Kampf isn't playing at their level.

Maatta and Seabs are slow but looked decent. Maatta plays good positioning for sure.

Besides the major turn over leading to the first goal by Gilbert, he looked good. He's hands down better then Koekko.

Keith is not a #1 anymore, he looked bad. While made some good plays made a lot of bad plays as well and definitely cost the team a goal if not 2.

Gus defensively looked bad but offensively looked extremely good.

Nylander was absent for 80% of the game but looked good for 20%.

Caggs has no business on the 1st line.

Shaw is Shaw...sometimes overskates but love his style.

Debrincat was manhandled on the boards but biggest effort on the team and skills to shoot.

Kane is hands down a top 5 player in the league...guy is a stud.

Toews was also solid.

Crow....wow...where did Crow go?


I agree on all of this, except I think Caggs fit better on that top line than Nylander did. Nylander has the skill, but I don't think Toews and Kane need a skill guy to play with them, they need a guy like Caggs or Shaw. It was also completely ridiculous how little Brandon Saad played today. I don't understand why Colliton doesn't play him more, but Saad looked like one of the more motivated and skilled guys on our team tonight and he plays less than 13 minutes. Absolutely absurd.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
Voir tout