SalarySwishSalarySwish

My take on Capitals 2019-20 with NAS and CBJ trades

Créé par: Sportnilsson
Équipe: 2019-20 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 18 août 2019
Publié: 18 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
The cap crunch is a problem, but not impossible to solve. However, other GMs are fully aware of this, and Caps may not get fair value in trades. Anyway, here are a couple of trades from my perspective:

NASHVILLE TRADE
I figure Djoos would be an upgrade over Hamhuis or Irwin on the 3LD in Predators' line-up. Carrier is a right-handed shot that had a 76-5-32-37 season with Milwaukee, at the age of 22, but Ellis and Fabbro are ahead of him, and maybe Weber if you value experience on the third pairing. He'll probably slot in as the top pairing RHD in Hershey, but may develop to an option on Capitals right side when Gudas' contract expires.

Djoos had a 58 points AHL season at that same age as Carrier, but also has a Stanley Cup ring to his name now. That's why I had a draft pick to even things out a bit.

COLUMBUS TRADE
Yes, it's a trade within the division, and Copley would be a good option to have available in the expansion draft, but still...
Columbus fans seems high on Korpisalo, even though I have never seen anything special in him. Anyway, back-up is the main thing for them. Both Elvis Merzlikins (Swiss league) and Veini Vehviläinen (Finnish league) are playing the first seasons on NA rinks, and may need time to adjust. In Copley, Blue Jackets get a solid back-up, giving Merzlikins and Vehviläinen time in the AHL. For Capitals, I say go for Vanecek as back-up and keep Samsonov as the main guy in Hershey (or keep interchanging them), with Kivlenieks being the back-up on Bears.

Since Columbus gets the better deal in the goalie switch, they have to give something back. Dean Kukan is 26, but may be passed by Carlsson and Gavrikov on a deep Columbus depth chart. Kukan could be the number seven guy for Capitals, giving the prospect playing time in Hersey, until they're ready. Hopefully, one (Alexeyev) or more may be ready next summer, when Kukan's contract expires to RFA status. Bindulis is just a fill-in to keep the organization depth at even numbers after the trade.

Oh, and yes, I have assigned Chandler Stephenson to the AHL. Can't see many team where he would be an upgrade at fourth line duty. Maybe as the Oilers fourth line center, instead of Kyle Brodziak, though the latter is better at face-offs.

With that said, let's shoot this down in flames... :-)
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Carrier, Alexandre
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WSH
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de NSH
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 720 962 $1 150 000 $82 500 $10 779 038 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

18 août 2019 à 6 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Good job, trades looks fair.
Can you do a 2020-2021 for the Caps ! Let me know wink
pinslack a aimé ceci.
18 août 2019 à 8 h 49
#2
JarmoK
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,428
Mentions "j'aime": 366
CBJ don’t need yet another backup goalie with limited experience
Eli a aimé ceci.
18 août 2019 à 9 h 12
#3
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Interesting, and complicated. All the steps make sense, but it might be helpful to evaluate gain/loss by each position, to see how the team has changed? Otherwise it's too confusing.

Defense: You've explained how Djoos>Kukan>Carrier. Maybe Carrier could play 3RD in fall of 2020, post-Gudas. But Johansen and Djoos play either side, and if Hershey doesn't plug in experienced guys, Johansen might finally get to develop? Of course a Johansen-Carrier top pair could move a lot of pucks for Hershey, and they're both still young enough to be defensive prospects. So that could come out fine, long term. Of course, if the Caps played Djoos with either of Carlson/Orlov this year, they could get him to 30 points. Could they afford his next arb award, after that? I don't know, but next summer a lowball offer on 30 pt Djoos might be Puljujarvi and a 2rd.

Goalie: Copley and Korpisalo each started 27 games last year behind terrific defensive teams that produced recent Vezina seasons for better goalies. Copley won 16 games with slightly better spct and GAA. Korpisalo won ten. Copley is CBJ's default starting goalie this year if the Caps promote Vanecek, which they totally don't need to do. You're already way under the cap after dropping Djoos and Stephenson, so CBJ has to actually give something of value. Davidsson gets it done. Kukan, not so much.

Forward: Port of the opportunity cost of trading Djoos for an RHD prospect is you have to stop talking to all the Detroit fans on here posting Djoos for Ehn+pick. If Stephenson is really cut (in spite of faceoffs, pk, and good playoff puck possession numbers) then Ehn becomes a decent call-up option this year, and his NHL experience means they could pencil him into the fourth line for fall of 2020, without any doubt. It's not great value for Djoos, and Ehn isn't any better than Stephenson so far, but he's got more time to develop, and maybe a big role in Hershey could help?

The Oilers would be better defensively if they gave Stephenson any positon in their bottom nine forwards, but they're obsessed with offense and youth, and probably wouldn't bother.

I agree with you that none of the options that other teams seem to like are particularly fair to Washington. Given the low rating their farm system is getting, adding some prospects might make sense, if it doesn't significantly hurt the big club. Ideally, they'd want guys with two or three years of waiver exemption, since they already have a couple guys they can call up right away at each spot and be fine. But maybe teams don't trade those guys? Maybe they should just go for picks, qualty or quantity.
18 août 2019 à 10 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,536
Still in the same boat of 22 man roster without room for a 23rd.
18 août 2019 à 11 h 6
#5
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Yojimbo
Still in the same boat of 22 man roster without room for a 23rd.


You call it a problem. We call it a feature. smile
Voir tout