SalarySwishSalarySwish

With Marleau without others

Créé par: palhal
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2019
Publié: 29 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
That's how I solve the Leafs cap woes this season. Trade just one player, Nylander with no cap in return. Certainly would like to upgrade one spot one defence. Maybe Hyman's LTIR till January would allow a short term cheap solution.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 750 000 $
34 000 000 $
610 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
    Two seconders rounders in 2019 Devils have three this year
    NJD
    1. Nylander, William
    Détails additionnels:
    Leafs need the cap space. Devils certainly get value potential. Right now is 7m is high but his 4.9m annual cash pay out...modest
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2019
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de DAL
    2020
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 000 000 $77 559 000 $0 $82 500 $5 441 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    29 avr. 2019 à 8 h 42
    #1
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 22,569
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,388
    4.9 annual cash payout for Nylander? Well that’s not even close to true.
    29 avr. 2019 à 9 h 35
    #2
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    I will never understand why people see trading Nylander for pennies on the dollar only to massively overpay Kapanen and Johnsson as a good idea. Nylander is far better than either of the other two and they have literally done nothing to deserve such big contracts. If that is there demand trade them. See if Minnesota would consider some kind of Kapanen for Greenway trade. Overpaying depth players is a recipe for disaster. The middle class in the NHL is on its way out, soon the play drivers will demand a much higher salary than those who benefit playing with them. Kapanen at times looked really good with Matthews but on his own, has difficulty doing much other than being a responsible player, sure that has value but nothing close to these kinds of numbers.
    kaljakori a aimé ceci.
    29 avr. 2019 à 10 h 17
    #3
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 60,917
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,462
    Quoting: LoganOllivier
    I will never understand why people see trading Nylander for pennies on the dollar only to massively overpay Kapanen and Johnsson as a good idea. Nylander is far better than either of the other two and they have literally done nothing to deserve such big contracts. If that is there demand trade them. See if Minnesota would consider some kind of Kapanen for Greenway trade. Overpaying depth players is a recipe for disaster. The middle class in the NHL is on its way out, soon the play drivers will demand a much higher salary than those who benefit playing with them. Kapanen at times looked really good with Matthews but on his own, has difficulty doing much other than being a responsible player, sure that has value but nothing close to these kinds of numbers.


    Massively overpay Kapanen? Gee, he had 20 goals, 44 points. The best Nylander did was two seasons at 20 goals 61 points. So who is overpaid Kapanen at 4m or Nylander at 7m?
    I know it's subjective, but to think Nylander is "far better", I think is false. At value per dollar, I would take Kapanen and Johnson on the team at 7.8 combined rather than Nylander at 7m.
    And talk about struggling without Matthews....what did Nylander do this season. 7 goals, 20 assists, 27 points in 54 games.
    29 avr. 2019 à 10 h 26
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    Quoting: palhal
    Massively overpay Kapanen? Gee, he had 20 goals, 44 points. The best Nylander did was two seasons at 20 goals 61 points. So who is overpaid Kapanen at 4m or Nylander at 7m?
    I know it's subjective, but to think Nylander is "far better", I think is false. At value per dollar, I would take Kapanen and Johnson on the team at 7.8 combined rather than Nylander at 7m.
    And talk about struggling without Matthews....what did Nylander do this season. 7 goals, 20 assists, 27 points in 54 games.


    Nylander missed training camp, and never really was given a chance to play with Matthews. Despite a 10 game stretch where he did and also had 9 points in those games before Babcock moved him down in hopes of energizing both Kadri and Kapanen who hadn't scored in a while. Then in the playoffs, playing with Matthews, Kapanen had 1 good game. Nylander played most of the series with two players who just can't score anymore and still ended up with more points than Kapanen. Nylander is better, he had 2 60 point seasons while Kapanen couldn't crack the lineup.

    I get that you really don't like Nylander but there is utterly no reasonable arguement to suggest this last season was anything other than a bad luck outlier fueled by missing training camp and a 3rd of the season. I think Kapanen gets way too much love for what he's accomplished. He had 20 goals and 44 points in his first full season, I think his best season of his career will be a 30+ goal 60 point season where I think Nylander's best season will be upwards of 90 points and 30+ goals. So which is a better contract? A point a game player at just under 7 or a 40-60 point winger making 5? I'd take the point a game guy 100% of the time, especially when you should be able to find a cheaper 40 point guy from the players that are being developed in the system.
    29 avr. 2019 à 10 h 43
    #5
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 60,917
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,462
    Quoting: LoganOllivier
    Nylander missed training camp, and never really was given a chance to play with Matthews. Despite a 10 game stretch where he did and also had 9 points in those games before Babcock moved him down in hopes of energizing both Kadri and Kapanen who hadn't scored in a while. Then in the playoffs, playing with Matthews, Kapanen had 1 good game. Nylander played most of the series with two players who just can't score anymore and still ended up with more points than Kapanen. Nylander is better, he had 2 60 point seasons while Kapanen couldn't crack the lineup.

    I get that you really don't like Nylander but there is utterly no reasonable arguement to suggest this last season was anything other than a bad luck outlier fueled by missing training camp and a 3rd of the season. I think Kapanen gets way too much love for what he's accomplished. He had 20 goals and 44 points in his first full season, I think his best season of his career will be a 30+ goal 60 point season where I think Nylander's best season will be upwards of 90 points and 30+ goals. So which is a better contract? A point a game player at just under 7 or a 40-60 point winger making 5? I'd take the point a game guy 100% of the time, especially when you should be able to find a cheaper 40 point guy from the players that are being developed in the system.


    Sorry if you think because I disagree with you that "I don't like Nylander". I just think there are better value for Leafs than Nylander. And and Leafs have to shed cap this season. Yes, a point a game guy making 7m would e a bargain. But it isn't Nylander....he's a .75 game a guy, until proven otherwise. And I think he's going to have prove it for another team.
    Voir tout